Northern Eurasia Earth Science Partnership Initiative

Environmental News From Northern Eurasia

Archive


Central Asia Is Corrupted by Cotton
Financial Times, March 10, 2005
By Quentin Peel

The World Trade Organisation ruling last week that billions of dollars in US subsidies to cotton farmers were illegal amounts to a big moral victory for developing countries trying to compete on the world market.

If sanity and fairness were to prevail in both the US and the European Union, scrapping subsidy systems that guarantee wealthy farmers prices far above the world market level should curb unfair competition. In Africa alone, such market distortion is estimated to cost producers more than Dollars 400m (Pounds 207m) a year. Yet even if change comes - and that depends on facing down formidable lobbies in Washington and Brussels - hundreds of thousands of cotton farmers in central Asia, the source of over 15 per cent of world cotton exports, would not benefit. For most, a chronically corrupt farm system at home means they are so far removed from the world market that its price fluctuations have no impact on their daily lives.

Cotton is a vital industry in what is an increasingly unstable but strategic part of the world. It is a crop that dominates the economies and the politics of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, autocratic post-Soviet states bordering Afghanistan. They are big routes for heroin smuggling to Europe and the west. All face potential threats to their undemocratic systems from underground groups, including those inspired by radical Islam.

The problem is that cotton in those countries is not a source of stability but a curse, as a graphic new report from Crisis Group*, the non-profit conflict resolution group, declares. It is a monoculture "more destructive to central Asia's future than the tons of heroin that regularly transit the region", it says. Yet while the international community has invested millions of dollars in trying to curb drug running, practically nothing has been done to counteract the negative impact of the cotton industry.

The sorry story of cotton growing in central Asia is an extraordinary combination of blind Soviet ambition, Stalinist compulsion, post-Soviet corruption and utter disregard for the environment. Although the region has an ideal climate for cotton, it relies on massive irrigation for its cultivation, causing chronic salinisation of farmland, desertification, and destruction of the Aral Sea, which has shrunk by three quarters and turned into two small inland lakes.

The political and social consequences of the industry have been just as destructive as the ecological ones since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The crisis stems from a common failure to reform the old collectivised agriculture system and its domination by state buying and supply agencies. Instead of the state exploiting the farms, however, a system has developed in each republic where well-connected middlemen, closely related to the ruling dynasties, perform that role.

In Tajikistan, for example, they are known as "investors" or "futures companies" - fancy names for a form of usury that combines a monopoly on credit, inputs and purchasing in each region. Financed by international traders, they advance credit to farmers to buy inputs, against future sales of cotton. The prices of the inputs are inflated while the cotton purchase price is depressed. The consequence is that Tajik cotton farmers now owe an estimated Dollars 220m to the middlemen.

The state gets a 10 per cent sales tax from cotton but the private "investors" earn the big profits, supported by government pressure on the producers. The state still owns the land and sets production quotas. Collective farms are now called "collective peasant farms", with no real independence for the farmers. In their desperation, they grow more and more cotton at the expense of food crops. Tajikistan was never able to feed itself but now imports about half its needs, relying increasingly on food aid.

Tajikistan is the least oppressive of the three main cotton-growing republics of central Asia, described by the US State Department's annual human rights report as having "an authoritarian government (with) some democratic institutions". Elections in 2000 were "neither free nor fair". The recent democratic revolts in Georgia and Ukraine have caused the government to clamp down on any signs of serious opposition.

Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have far worse human rights records. In both, cotton plays a central role in the system of corrupt exploitation and rural poverty. Forced labour during the cotton harvests is widespread, including child labour. "All three countries outlaw child labour," says the Crisis Group report. "Yet during any given harvest the cotton fields will be full of children, some very young."

The combination of state compulsion to grow cotton and miserable incomes in return has caused widespread flight from the land, both to the cities and out of the country (mainly to Russia). The young unemployed rural labourers are a prime source of recruitment for radical Islamic movements.

Although the international financial institutions, such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, have invested in model projects of agricultural reform, they have barely dented the system. The international cotton tradersmay express concern privately at the social conditions but offer little hope of change. After all, they deal with state organisations and middlemen, not farmers.

The prospects for reform seem grim. It is a post-Soviet world that in many ways is more oppressive and corrupt than the one that used to exist. But it is not a priority in Washington or Brussels. It probably will remain that way until the revolution comes.


Siberians Fear Minus 30 Is Too Warm for Comfort
The Daily Telegraph(London), March 05, 2005
By Julius Strauss in Yuchyugay

The afternoon high is a little below minus 30 degrees Celsius an hour outside the small Siberian settlement of Yuchyugay, even in the pale winter sun. But at this time of the year, locals say with a frown, it should be a steady minus 50. As cars roll across the wide, frozen rivers, traces of running water show where the current runs so fast that the ice melts, a phenomenon, the locals insist, that should only occur much later in the season.

Environmental research already points to rapid climate change in the Arctic and sub-Arctic in years to come, endangering many animals native to the taiga. If some forecasts are to be believed, the polar bear could be extinct by the end of the century.

But in the remotest parts of Siberia the changes have been under way for more than a decade and are even now disrupting the lives of the nomadic herders, hunters and trappers.

According to the locals, the problem is less a rise in temperature than the fact that the weather now varies dramatically from one day to the next, with temperatures sometimes rising or falling up to 30 degrees in the space of a few days.

The Yakuts who live here, an Asiatic people who made their way north centuries before the first Russians arrived, are alarmed. Valentin Adlasov, the local mayor, said: "The average temperature here in winter used to be minus 53 to 55 degrees and would last for two or three months continuously. Now temperatures vary from week to week. One week its warm, say minus 30, then the temperature falls suddenly to minus 55." Now that the ground no longer freezes properly in winter, in summer the roads and bridges built on the permafrost subside, making transport difficult.

There is also frequent and widespread flooding in summer. "We have unfamiliar birds that come here now and insects that we have never seen before," the mayor said. "For the old, the changes are dangerous. The huge variations in pressure mean that people have become susceptible to strokes. Others have headaches."

There is also concern that the change in climate will ruin the Yakuts' efforts to pull themselves out of the post-Communist economic mire following the cut in central funding.

Sergei Popov, an ethnic Yakut and a tourist guide, said: "There is no longer proper freezing in the winter and because of that the rivers flood in the summer. They carry away bridges, houses, sometimes whole villages. "The flooding also strands animals and disrupts their migratory patterns. For the reindeer herders it has made life much more difficult."

The problem is not confined to Yuchyugay. Locals say communities all over Yakutia, a Russian republic larger than Europe, are also aghast.

In Chukotka, the region to the east of Yakutia and hard up against the Bering Strait, the Chukchis say that, as the ice thins, the walrus, a mainstay of their diet, is becoming scarce.

For years the Kremlin echoed the view of the Bush administration that the evidence for global warming is insubstantial and may be wrong.

Only last year President Vladimir Putin made light of western ecologists' warnings. Tatyana Vlassova, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, recently spent four years working on the Arctic Climate Impact Survey. Her team surveyed 10 areas of northern Russia.

She said: "When I began I was very sceptical. But the evidence the locals put forward is overwhelming. The reindeer pastures are going, the permafrost is thawing, there is flooding and soil erosion. It's having a huge effect on the traditional way people live."


Russia's Birth Rate Grows, Though Not Enough
RIA Novosti, March 03, 2005 By Olga Sobolevskaya

Moscow -- "Every year 1,500,000 babies are born in Russia -- this dynamics has been increasing since 2000. But it is still not enough for normal reproduction of the Russian population", vice-president of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences Vladimir Kulakov told the RIA Novosti press conference on women's problems. He is the chief gynecologist-obstetrician at the Ministry for Health Protection and Social Development. The conference is held on eve of March 8, International Women's Day.

He said that the country needs another 700,000-800,000 newborns to reach the normal level of population reproduction. Meanwhile, of the 37.5 million Russia women of the reproductive age - between 15 and 45 years of age - up to 7 million are infertile. Annually, from 170,000 to 200,000 wishful pregnancies are lost in Russia. "Given sufficient state financing and due approach, the figure could have been reduced", Mr. Kulakov stressed. Physicians have all the necessary technologies to do so. "The state should put motherhood and childhood under protection", allocating larger sums for the treatment of infertility, help in pregnancy, he said.

Should a serious increase in the birth rate be hoped for? Evidently not. Out of the 10 million girls below 18 years of age only 10 to 15 percent are in good health. The incidence of sexually transmitted diseases is increasing.

It is more social than medicinal question. "Now, we have only 1.32 births per woman, while 2.2 is needed for the normal reproduction of population", said Anatoli Vishnevski, head of the Demography and Human Ecology Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. In their reproductive behavior Russian women are approximating to European - births come at an older age.

The average age of women giving birth to the first child is now 26.3 years in Russia. Ten years ago it was 24.5 years. "Since 2002 women of twenty six years and over have for the first time been contributing more to the birth rate than younger mothers", Mr. Vishnevski noted.

Today's increase in the birth rate is very much due to the realization of put-off births, when women first make a career and reach wellbeing, after which they give births. Russian women are beginning to afford having two and even three children, Mr. Vishnevski said. It is yet premature to think if this as a tendency, he thinks.


Nuclear Wasteland: Stalin's Legacy To Kazakhs
The International Herald Tribune, March 4, 2005 By C.J. Chivers

Semipalatinsk -- The road is an aged dirt track running in a line across the Central Asian steppe, past grazing cattle and horses, arriving at a hillock overlooking a parched basin.

There are no warning signs. There is no gate beside the abandoned guard shack at the remains of the fence. Only the climbing numbers on the radiation detector suggest that perhaps it would be best to turn around.

In the basin below, before much of it was vaporized, there once was one of the more awful open-air laboratories a nation has ever made, and one of the darker secrets ever kept.

Here, briefly, stood a metal tower roughly 30 meters, or 100 feet, high, ringed by sturdy objects: brick buildings, a bridge, bunkers of reinforced concrete and a park of idled tanks and aircraft, some with live animals tethered inside, set at various distances to see how they weathered what came next. Concrete observation towers were arranged at fixed distances in several directions, their instruments connected by subterranean cable to a distant command post where the experiment's masters could assess their work.

On this spot on a summer morning in 1949, Soviet scientists detonated Stalin's first atomic bomb. Over the next 40 years, in the air above the steppe and the soil of the surrounding area, scientists detonated at least 455 more.

Kazakhstan's nuclear arsenal is now gone; it was returned to Russia in the 1990s. But one of this sprawling country's dismal inheritances after decades of Moscow's rule is this vast poisoned zone. It is a measure of the disarray bedeviling many corners of the former Soviet Union that access to it is fully unrestricted. If you can find your way here, you can enter at will.

The car continues on, bouncing over the washboard trail and passing the buckled remains of an observation tower about three kilometers, or two miles, from ground zero for the first bomb, which U.S. intelligence officials dubbed Joe One, a derivative of Stalin's first name.

Near the very center, Yuri Strilchuk, an employee at Kazakhstan's National Nuclear Center, which conducts limited monitoring of the radiation emanating here, leaves the car and moves forward with careful steps, taking care not to drag his feet or overturn small stones. The ground, he says, is still "hot." Flipping stones turns the hotter sides up.

The dangers vary. Experts say that short visits, with a guide and a radiation detector to navigate through "cooler" areas, are not necessarily unsafe. A longer visit, or any disturbance of the soil, increases the risks.

Before Strilchuk are the ruins: scorched embankments of a vanished bridge, concrete bunkers with tops sheared away by shock waves of unimaginable force, the pond-sized hole on the spot where the tower that held Joe One stood.

Stalin regarded the work here as so vital that the atomic program's director, Igor Kurchatov, worried that if he failed he would be shot. The nearby research city, now a near ghost town called Kurchatov, was not marked on maps. Its postal address was frequently changed to mislead spies. (The names included Moscow 400, Semipalatinsk 21 and Nadezhda, Russian for hope.)

Strilchuk moves forward. The sights are otherworldly. The blasts generated such heat that the surface of the steppe was liquefied and splashed onto the surviving steel and concrete. The substance remains a thick and dark lacquer, frozen as it oozed and dripped.

It is also underfoot. Marble-size balls of glassified soil crunch beneath Strilchuk's boots. He reads his meter. Safer to stand here, he says. Not there.

Bits of life have returned around him. Grass pokes through the baked soil. Birds bank on the wind. Scattered here and there are the droppings of sheep, goats, horses and cows. There are signs of man as well: empty vodka bottles on the baked earth, torn potato chip bags.

The test range is a peculiar post-Soviet legacy. In an area roughly the size of Israel, the Joe One site is just one of several places where the hundreds of bombs were detonated.

No one who lives nearby can be sure the meat in markets did not come from animals that grazed on radioactive grass. No one knows where all of the irradiated metal has gone. What is known is this: The site has been stripped almost bare. Scavenging gangs have yanked the thick copper cables from the ground and dismantled and carted away the parked aircraft and fighting vehicles.

Almost everything has vanished radioactive waste converted to scrap. "They take the metal and sell it," he said. People as far away as Siberia have complained of symptoms from exposure. Various studies have labeled the region an environmental disaster. And the extent of pollution remains unknown, in part because Russia has not provided detailed information about the tests.


Russian, US Scientists Discuss Polar Research Cooperation
ITAR-TASS News Agency, February 26, 2005
By Ivan Lebedev

Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolai Laverov met in Washington with leaders of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to discuss prospects for cooperation between Russian and U.S. scientists in connection with the International Polar Year.

Laverov in an interview with Itar-Tass on Friday reminded that Russia proposed to implement the programme of the Third International Polar Year in 2007-2008. Under discussion now are concrete steps in Arctic research, including organisation of scientific Arctic expeditions, the academician said.

Preparations for the Third International Polar Year are under way also in the Arctic Council in which Russia recently took over the presidency for two years.

Objectives of the organisation set up nine years ago are protection of the environment in the Arctic, development of cooperation among countries in the region and social and economic support for northern indigenous peoples.

The organisation groups Russia, the United States, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway and Iceland. Moscow considers the international Polar Year one of the main areas of its work in the Arctic Council.


Russia to Pursue UN Project of Arctic, Siberia Development
ITAR-TASS News Agency, February 25, 2005
By Andrei Polyakov

A UN project of development of Arctic and Siberian regions will be implemented in Russia.

The project was approved at the 23rd session of directors of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) finishing in Nairobi on Friday. Protection of water and Arctic resources was written large on the agenda of the session.

"This is the problem in which Russia is interested in a full measure," Deputy Minister of Economic Resources Valentin Stepankov told Itar-Tass. He led a Russian delegation to the five-day session.

UNEP Executive Director Klaus Topfter has taken big personal efforts in order this 30-million dollar project of sustainable development of our Arctic and Siberian regions became possible" Stepankov said. The major project will be carried out not in a group of countries but only in Russia. The project has been prepared for five years in order it encompassed Russia's most acute Arctic problems.

It envisages preservation of biodiversity, the establishment of rational use of water resources and the cleaning of contaminated areas a lot of which have appeared over the years of development of the Arctic.

The project is aimed at solving the difficult task of achieving a balance between ecology and the economy and at development of indigenous ethnic groups.


WWF Study Hails Value of FSC Certification
Printing World, February 24, 2005
By Catherine Carter

Forest Stewardship Council certification brings added value to society, the environment and the economy, says WWF. A study by the organisation into the changes required for certification of 18 million hectares of forests in Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Russia, Sweden and the UK shows significant improvements to biodiversity conservation, management planning, health and safety and the employment rights of forest workers.

The study analysed 2,817 Corrective Action Requests raised by independent certifiers as forest managers detailed shortcomings on environmental, social and economic issues. These were the basis for WWF's analysis of the improvements achieved on the ground through FSC.

Duncan Pollard, head of the WWF European Forest Programme, said: "We simply looked at what actual changes FSC certification has brought in forest management, and the results speak for themselves. The study also brings out clearly the social and economic benefits which FSC brings for policymakers, governments, forest owners, the forest industry, employees in the forest industry and recreational forest users."

In Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Russia, Sweden and the UK, biodiversity values were improved through measures such as: lower impact silviculture; improved protection of key habitats; increased deadwood levels; measures favouring species diversity; reduced soil compaction; improved water management and improved pollution control.

In all six countries, FSC certification led to safer working conditions and enhanced worker skills, improved long term planning and strategies for minimising economic damage.


Pipeline Spells Doom for World's Rarest Cat
The Daily Telegraph (London), January 22, 2005
By Charles Clover

A proposed oil pipeline could be the death knell for the last 30 Amur leopards living in the wild, a spokesman for London Zoo said yesterday.

The zoo expressed its "disbelief and concern" at the decision by the Russian government to allow the pipeline to be built through the cats' last redoubt. The Amur leopard, named after the river on the border between China and Russia, is the most northern of eight leopard sub-species and is distinguished by its long winter coat and its large rosettes.

The Zoological Society of London, which runs the zoo, learned about the planned pipeline through the Kedrovya Pad nature reserve, a Unesco biosphere reserve, following a recent meeting between the Russian industry and energy minister, Victor Khristenko, and the Japanese foreign minister.

A society spokesman said: "The pressure on these fragile ecosystems will be disastrous. We fear this will be the death warrant for the rarest cat on Earth."

The pounds 5 billion pipeline, intended to carry oil from central Siberia to the Japanese Sea, will cut through both the protected reserve and unprotected areas of the Amur leopard's range, between Vladivostok and the Sino-Russian border. Construction work will bring roads, houses and labourers who are likely to hunt for food.

The route proposed will reach the sea at Bukhta Perevoznaya, at present a pristine stretch of coast.

The zoological society said lobbying by local interests seemed to be responsible for the proposed route which makes little sense economically or environmentally. There is a terminal site with existing infrastructure further north and that route would miss the leopard's habitat. It appears that the proposal bypassed a legal requirement to consider alternative sites.

Conservationists said the Amur leopard population had begun to recover, thanks to the efforts of conservation bodies including the Zoological Society of London. There are about 100 Amur leopards in breeding programmes in European zoos.

Sarah Christie, conservation programme manager for the society and European co-ordinator for the Amur leopard breeding programme, said: "The choice of this route for the pipeline will tip the balance for the last 30 Amur leopards and for many other endangered species in south-west Primorye." The area, in Primorski Krai province, is considered, environmentally, to be the richest in the Russian Far East, having 30 per cent of the country's endangered species.

Conservationists said the Russian oil industry had the worst environmental record in the world with large areas of Siberia and the Russian Arctic, where oil was being pumped, being turned into black lakes and swamps.


Warm Weather Sets New Record for Moscow
Moscow News (Russia), January 19, 2005
By Anna Arutunyan and Oleg Liakhovich

The recent warm spell has broken all temperature records for a Moscow winter, sending the thermometer up to 6 degrees Celsius, which is the highest in recorded history for January, second place goes to the winter of '92 at 5.6 C.

Meteorologists attribute the unusually warm weather in the European part of Russia to high cyclone activity and expect a fall in temperatures in the second half of January. The anomaly has caused not only mild problems - such as for members of several ice sculpture contests - but some serious concerns as well - storm warnings were released in Moscow, while St. Petersburg was flooded due to the rapid rise of the Neva River. People suffering from various cardiovascular conditions may also be affected by the anomalous temperature shifts, medics warn. Meanwhile, for some Muscovites spring has indeed arrived early this year: visitors to the Moscow Zoo have witnessed mating rituals among some of the inhabitants, namely black swans. Although meteorologists deny that the current warm spell is related to global warming, it has been acknowledged that in the past 20 years winters in Russia have grown considerably milder, with only occasional legendary Russian frosts of yore. Better enjoy them while you can.


Race for the Arctic: an International Cold War Has Begun
The Independent (London), January 5, 2005
By Daniel Howden

Deep inside the Arctic Circle, hundreds of miles beyond the frontier of human habitation, a solitary red flag with a white cross flies in the freezing winds, its pole hammered into the unyielding rock of Hans Island. Next to it lies a plaque that tells the world the Vikings have returned.

The tiny island, a hostile wedge of rock poised between the north-west corner of Greenland and Canada's Ellesmere Island, where winter temperatures plummet to 40C below, is normally home to a seal colony and the occasional polar bear.

Now it finds itself on the front line of the race to claim the North Pole, a modern scramble for the Arctic that has pitted tiny Denmark against its Nato ally Canada, with Russia and the United States lurking in the wings. At stake, in what could be the last great territorial land-grab, is the promise of untold mineral riches that has prompted an increasing number of governments to throw tens of millions of pounds at scientific and military missions in a bid to get ahead.

These days the Vikings do not come in long-ships. The Danish navy sent HDMS Vaedderen, a 3,500-ton frigate with a reinforced hull, into the disputed channel that forms the maritime border between Canada and Greenland, the world's largest island and a semi-independent Danish territory, and more importantly, only 500 miles south of the North Pole.

And the elite Sirius Patrol, a contingent of specially trained Arctic soldiers, sleds and dogs, completed a hazardous patrol to the north-east shore of Greenland. The success of the Vaedderen and Sirius missions in proving their ability to operate so far north has given Denmark the confidence to stake its claim to the North Pole.

Trine Dahl Jensen, a geologist, is heading the team of scientists tasked with proving that Denmark's northern frontier is a lot further north than anyone expected. And she is more aware than most that the Danes' argument is complex and expensive to prove.

What they must resolve, Ms Dahl-Jensen says, is where Greenland's continental socket ends and where the ocean floor begins. Under the North Pole, the 2,000km-long Lomonosov Ridge of mountains runs from north of Greenland to north of Siberia. If hi-tech measurements prove Greenland's socket is attached to the ridge, they are in business. "We must be able to argue that it is a natural extension of Greenland," she says.

In the lobby of her offices at the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS), there is a mechanical reminder of what they are working towards. A giant Foucault's pendulum is patiently tracking the rotation of the Earth around its South and North Pole axis. So far, no nation has actually secured territorial rights to either but the dawning of 2005 means the clock is ticking. That is the deadline for the Danish parliament to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The 1986 treaty affords coastal countries an economic zone extending 370km from their shores. If the socket is part of Greenland, then the North Pole could be part of Denmark.

"In 100 or 150 years, the ice may have melted significantly, making the area available for ships," Ms Dahl Jensen says. "This may seem far away, but in 10 years we will lose the right to make any territorial claims whatsoever."

The scientific work has to be completed within 10 years from the date that Denmark ratifies the UN convention. Ms Dahl-Jensen and her team have been given pounds 14m in government grants for a project said by the Danish ministry of science to have "historic dimensions". The windfall budget is a dream come true. "In any other situation, we would never have received this kind of funding," she says.

At her desk in an overheated, cupboard-sized office lined with polar maps on both walls, the Danish scientist with her blonde hair and broad forehead looks a true descendant of her Viking forebears. Contrary to expectations, the main challenge her group faced this spring, on their first expeditions into the Polar Basin, was weather warmer than usual. "We need cold conditions, preferably between 30 to 40 degrees below," the geologist says. "We can't land helicopters on the ice, if there is too much water on it."

After landing and setting up camp, the team uses sonar equipment and audio waves produced by controlled explosions and air cannons to map out the sea bed. Some of the equipment is already in place along the northern shores of Greenland.

But there is a greater imperative behind the latest round of grandiose territorial claims than the workings of international law. The Inuit, who have lived for centuries in and around the Arctic Circle were among the first to notice it and they do not even have words for what they were seeing. Many indigenous languages have no vocabulary for the legions of animals, insects and plants that have advanced north as global warming melts the polar ice and invites forest to creep over the thawed tundra. "We can't even describe what we are seeing," says Sheila Watt-Cloutier, chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference which claims to represent more than 150,000 people across Canada, Alaska, Greenland and Russia.

An eight-nation report in November revealed that the Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet and that the North Pole could be ice-free in summertime by the end of the century. Around the Arctic, salmon are moving up into more northerly waters, hornets are beginning to buzz and barn owls are appearing in regions where indigenous people have never seen a barn. The Arctic report said polar bears were "unlikely to survive as a species" if the ice disappeared and they were left to compete with their better-adapted brown and grizzly cousins.

What is for some an environmental catastrophe might be a great commercial opportunity. Diamond finds in Canada's Nunavut have already fired a mining rush and propelled the country into the ranks of a top-three producer. Ottawa is counting on tapping what the government suspects are major natural gas reserves in the Beaufort Sea, the frigid zone bordering the Yukon and Alaska, where diplomatic swords were crossed with the US when it tried unsuccessfully to auction off the area to oil companies last year. The companies reportedly balked at the prospect of finding their purchases challenged in an international squabble.

What no one disagrees with is the riches that would come from the thaw creating a north-west passage. The centuries old bane of Arctic explorers could become a reality thanks to global warming, cutting thousands of miles off the shipping routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and delivering a windfall to any country able to tax its users.

In August, Canada spent C$ 4.9m (pounds 2.2m) in a show of force, sending hundreds of troops, helicopters, a frigate and an ice-breaker on a training exercise in search of mock satellite debris. Bad weather grounded planes, two soldiers were lost for a night and a fire on an ageing Sea King helicopter exposed the limits of the present force. This year, the government has approved the launching of the Radarsat II to provide high-resolution surveillance across the Arctic and monitor ships on the surface.

Canada's Defence Minister, Bill Graham, was well aware global warming has added a new urgency to claims in the Arctic. " It has created new possibilities and new threats," he told The New York Times. "We need more resources up there and we are going to look for ways to deploy them. The sense is that now is the time." The government has allocated C$ 70m for its own underwater mapping. One Canadian diplomat says: "To stake a territorial claim, you must be able to demonstrate you can actively patrol and enforce it, if necessary militarily."

Beneath the pack ice are the nuclear submarines of Russia, patrolling the dark water. Moscow has already made a failed attempt to stake its own claim to the Lomonosov Ridge, and thereby to the North Pole.

Faced with a common enemy, Canada and Denmark have begun to negotiate to fund a joint programme, which will divide the hefty expenses. Kai Sorensen, the deputy director of GEUS, says Denmark and Canada share a common interest in arguing that the natural divide of the North Pole is formed by the Lomonosov Ridge, which creates a natural median line between Canada, Greenland and across the North Pole to Russian territory.

Moscow has based claims on the so-called sector principle. A division along the median line would give Denmark territorial rights to the North Pole in accordance with the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea, but the sector principle would divide the North Pole along sectors formed by longitudes, thus splitting the Pole into several territories.

That has not stopped the Danes getting excited. "The North Pole is one of the only virgin territories left on the globe," says Torquil Meedon, a senior official at Denmark's ministry of science and technology. "Climate changes indicate that ice in the Polar Sea may disappear within 50 to 100 years. That will open up the North-west Passage as a new and valuable shipping route. It will also be open to fishing, and the oil and gas reserves which may prove significant. Who knows how valuable the rights to the North Pole could be 100 years from now?"

Denmark feels it has been left behind by its neighbours. Norway, once a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, is now the world's number three oil- exporting nation, but Danes have been bystanders. Once, the Viking influence stretched from the Baltic across the North Sea and even, some historians say, across the Atlantic.

Now the Danes are eyeing the chance of taking the lead in what they hope could become the fossil fuel bonanza of the 21st century. But not all those leading the scramble agree that victory will make the winner rich. Ms Dahl-Jensen says there is no solid evidence to suggest the area of 200,000sq km will contain any wealth of natural resources.

Just as in long-gone eras, the race to claim new territory is, in large part, about regaining long-lost status. "It is all surreal," says Ole Kvaerno, director of the Institute of Strategy and Political Science at the Royal Danish Defence College, who finds the sudden territorial ambitions amusing."Strategically speaking, the North Pole is unimportant. It's not at all like Greenland." The US-controlled Thule air base has been a vital listening and patrol post between east and west throughout the Cold War.

"It really strikes me that various nations have begun to make these impossible territorial claims," he says. "What will be the next territorial claim: space? If Denmark gains territorial rights according to the UN convention, we would control the seabed and any resources beneath. In this case, we would have to make regular flights in the area to make sure nobody puts up unwanted oilrigs. It would be very expensive, but not impossible."

With bragging rights to one of the last, great, unexplored territories at stake not everyone is being rational. Mr Kvaernoe smiles wryly, and shrugs. "The North Pole; it sounds pretty cool, doesn't it?"


Not a Single National Reserve Was Set Up in Russia Since 2000
RIA Novosti, December 29, 2004

Moscow -- Not a single national reserve or park was set up in Russia in the past four years, merited ecologist of Russia Vsevolod Stepanitsky, former head of a department at the state nature protection agencies, told journalists today. "The last breakthrough in the development of protected areas was made 50 years ago," he said.

Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said attempts have been made in the past few years to illegally transfer a part of 13 reserve territories to economic cultivation. "Regrettably, state agencies cannot, and frequently do not want to, take measures to protect reserves."
There are 95 state reserves, 35 national parks and 11 federal preserves in Russia, which occupy about 3% of the national territory and are located mostly in European Russia and in southern areas of the Far East. Their aggregate personnel is more than 10,000.

A group of 28 reserves are part of the international network of biospheric reserves involved in global ecological monitoring. Nearly all of the Russian reserves are subordinate to the Department of Protected Territories and Facilities at the National Resources Ministry. The Barguzin reserve set up in 1917 is the first officially registered state reserve.


Russian Coal Region Governor Says Output Boost to Be Curbed by Eco-Concern. BBC Monitoring International Reports, December 28, 2004
Source: Radio Russia, Moscow, in Russian 1030 gmt 28 Dec 04

Kemerovo Region is to curb increases in coal output to address environmental concerns, the region's governor Aman Tuleyev said in a telephone interview given to Radio Russia's "At first hand" on 28 December. He also spoke of his reservations about the new law allowing the president to appoint regional leaders.

Tuleyev began the interview with host Natalya Bekhtina by saying it had been in some ways "a difficult year" for his coal-mining region. He recalled that there had been three pit tragedies during the year. At the same time, overall it had been "a year of creating, a year of great labour and records", the governor said.

Coal industry: Tuleyev noted that for the first time in 15 years the region had achieved coal production of 157m tonnes. He added that nine new coal enterprises had been opened, which means 4,500 new jobs. In addition, R14bn had been spent on modernizing plant, he told Bekhtina.

However, the main success had been to "conquer global markets", Tuleyev said. After all, the governor pointed out, the key thing is not to mine coal but to sell it. He said that an important factor contributing to this success had been the building of coal terminals in various parts of Russia.

Tuleyev recalled that he had told President Putin recently that whatever other concerns the head of state might have he could rest easy about coal. "Russia is fully stocked with coal," Tuleyev stressed. He also drew attention to the fact that Kemerovo Region was the only area in Russia to increase its coal production this year.

However, there are problems, especially environmental ones, the governor said. "The length of our rivers has decreased by something like 100 km, and 200 rivers have been ruined, " Tuleyev noted, adding that 65,000 ha of land has to be reclaimed and recultivated after being exploited by mining.

Tuleyev said that in view of these environmental concerns coal production should not be pushed beyond 170m tonnes a year. At the same time, he stressed the need to adjust the region's economic strategy away from simply mining coal to processing it so that it can sold at higher prices.

Money should be channelled into projects to rehabilitate land, forests and rivers, the governor said. He went on to stress the importance of agriculture in the regional economy, saying that Kemerovo Region needed to produce at least 1m tonnes of grain. This year the region produced over 1.3m tonnes, he added.

New law on appointing governors; Asked about the change in the law on the appointment of governors, Tuleyev said he would not be trying to challenge it. "Now the law has been passed, I'm a loyal soldier. You have to implement a law that has been passed," he commented. At the same time, in the new conditions governors need some sort of protection from bureaucratic corruption in Moscow, he argued.


WB Ready to Allocate Grants for Ecological Projects in Russia
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 20, 2004

The World Bank is ready to allocate grants for the implementation of ecological projects in Russia, the WB director for Russia, Kristalina Georgieva, told the Prime-Tass news agency on Monday.

According to the WB official, there are several funds within the World Bank with a total amount of 800 million dollars, which extend grants for ecological projects. Such projects are actively implemented in Latin American countries.

Besides, the World Bank is ready to provide Russian companies with technologies for the assessment of ecological projects and their conformity with global international relations in ecological issues.

Within the framework of negotiations with the Russian government, the World Bank can offer a system for monitoring carbon emissions into the atmosphere to assess Russia's possibilities for trading emission quotas. According to Georgieva, this market is estimated for Russia at dozens of billions of dollars.

As for projects for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the World Bank has experience in the marketing of remaining quotas for greenhouse emissions. In particular, the World Bank can help concrete enterprises, cities and municipalities implement projects for the reduction of greenhouse emissions, their efforts financed by the funds formed by companies from other countries, which may obtain certificates and thus some of the quotas.

She said the Unified Energy Systems of Russia demonstrates interest for such projects, as it can transfer some electric power stations for geothermal sources instead of liquid fuel.

According to Georgieva, the money Russia can get within the framework of quotas, can be channeled into the sphere of power industry and for the updating of infrastructure.


Norway, Russia Attach Importance to Environmental Cooperation
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 8, 2004
By Nikolai Gorbunov

Oslo -- The Norwegian government attaches great importance to cooperation in environmental protection with Russia, Norwegian Minister for Environmental Protection Knut Arild Hareide said on Wednesday in connection with the tenth anniversary of the Russian-Norwegian "Clean production" ecological program.

Norway has invested 53 million crowns ($8.5 million) for the program's implementation in Russia over the past ten years. Many enterprises have started producing "cleaner" products in ecological terms. More than 1,500 engineers have been retrained, toxic emissions in the atmosphere have been cut. "Norway will continue supporting the implementation of such programs in Russia," Hareide emphasized.


Russia, France to Set Up Joint Lab in Antarctica
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 6, 2004

By Daria Tokareva

Russian and French researchers will set up a network of joint laboratories for work in promising directions, including in the Antarctica.

Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolai Platte and French Ambassador to Russia Jean Kades on Monday signed seven agreements on cooperation in the field of science and research and on the establishment of research centers I the field of chemistry, physics, mathematics and environmental studies.

"An entire network of joint laboratories will be created, one of them in the frame of a global warming research project, which will study carbon and ozone climate cycles in Siberia," Nikolai Plate said at the signing.

According to him, Russia and French researchers will also "drill through the glacier atop Lake Vostok on the icy continent at the South Pole for the purpose of climatologic studies."

The Russian Academy vice-president stressed, "The agreements will not only consolidate Russian-French scientific ties but also expand the common scientific space between Russia and Europe."

German and French researchers will take part in the implementation of two of the seven joint projects. Earlier this year, a Russian-French convention was signed in Paris concerning joint work in prospecting for, and developing deposits of metals, according to sources at the Russian Academy of Sciences. French and Russian specialists have set up a joint center for work in this direction.

The steering committee for cooperation of Russia with the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) decided at its recent meeting to expand cooperation of Russia's state higher schools with the world leading scientific research centers.

"Young Russian scientists will conduct research and studies at major international venues , and postgraduate students from Germany and France will come to Russia in the nearest future to defend their research theses," an official at the Russian Education and Science Ministry told Itar-Tass.


Space Photographs to Help Curb Timber Theft in Russia
RIA Novosti, December 02, 2004

Moscow -- Russia will use space photographing to fight timber theft. Mr. Valery Roshchupkin, head of the Federal Timber Agency, said a system of operational monitoring, in particular space and aerial photographing, will be employed soon to fight timber theft.

"At first, we will control a million hectares and spread the system to the whole of the national territory within three years," Mr. Roshchupkin told the newspaper Vedomosti.

In his words, modern military projects will be used for the purpose. Five processing stations will be set up in the Khabarovsk territory, the Novosibirsk region, the Krasnoyarsk territory, the Vologda region and in St. Petersburg or Karelia.

"Our aerial and space photographs will be used as proof in court trials of timber theft," he said. The agency head also called for raising timber export duties. He thinks it is not right that export duties on many kinds of deep-processed timber commodities are higher than the export duties on coniferous and broadleaf felled timber.

"Timber export duties should be raised in a differentiated manner," Mr. Roshchupkin said. "The top rate should be set for sawn timber, plywood and veneer sheets."
He believes that this will have a positive effect on the work of Russian sawmills and plywood companies, many of which are seriously short of raw materials.


Russia to Certify 0.3 Percent of Wood in 2004
RIA Novosti, December 03, 2004

Moscow -- Roman Shipov, adviser of the federal forestry agency chief, has reported about 0.3 percent of the entire wooded area in Russia to have been certified in 2004.

"Some 2.2 million hectares of forests have been already certified while the certification of another two million hectares is nearing completion. This means that about 0.3 percent of the entire area under forests in Russia will be certified in 2004," said Roman Shipov.

As of today, 150 million hectares of woods have been certified throughout the world, which constitutes 0.3 percent of their total area. Such countries with developed ecological legislation as Finland, Germany, Austria and Sweden have already certified 100 percent of the area under woods.

In Russia, most intense certification has swept the Arkhangelsk region, the Komi republic, the Irkutsk region and Krasnoyarsk territory. Voluntary forest certification in Russia has been since 2003 the responsibility of the national council for forest certification founded by agencies representing the government, business, science and public.

Adjustment, approbation and registering of documents on voluntary forest certification are planned for 2005 while the wide introduction of this system is scheduled for 2006, said Shipov. A forest certificate is a permit to utilize forests and an obligation on their restoration. Not only does certification confirm the legality of timber origin, it hampers the illegal felling of woods.


Race for the Arctic: an International Cold War Has Begun
The Independent (London), January 5, 2005
By Daniel Howden

Deep inside the Arctic Circle, hundreds of miles beyond the frontier of human habitation, a solitary red flag with a white cross flies in the freezing winds, its pole hammered into the unyielding rock of Hans Island. Next to it lies a plaque that tells the world the Vikings have returned.

The tiny island, a hostile wedge of rock poised between the north-west corner of Greenland and Canada's Ellesmere Island, where winter temperatures plummet to 40C below, is normally home to a seal colony and the occasional polar bear.

Now it finds itself on the front line of the race to claim the North Pole, a modern scramble for the Arctic that has pitted tiny Denmark against its Nato ally Canada, with Russia and the United States lurking in the wings. At stake, in what could be the last great territorial land-grab, is the promise of untold mineral riches that has prompted an increasing number of governments to throw tens of millions of pounds at scientific and military missions in a bid to get ahead.

These days the Vikings do not come in long-ships. The Danish navy sent HDMS Vaedderen, a 3,500-ton frigate with a reinforced hull, into the disputed channel that forms the maritime border between Canada and Greenland, the world's largest island and a semi-independent Danish territory, and more importantly, only 500 miles south of the North Pole.

And the elite Sirius Patrol, a contingent of specially trained Arctic soldiers, sleds and dogs, completed a hazardous patrol to the north-east shore of Greenland. The success of the Vaedderen and Sirius missions in proving their ability to operate so far north has given Denmark the confidence to stake its claim to the North Pole.

Trine Dahl Jensen, a geologist, is heading the team of scientists tasked with proving that Denmark's northern frontier is a lot further north than anyone expected. And she is more aware than most that the Danes' argument is complex and expensive to prove.

What they must resolve, Ms Dahl-Jensen says, is where Greenland's continental socket ends and where the ocean floor begins. Under the North Pole, the 2,000km-long Lomonosov Ridge of mountains runs from north of Greenland to north of Siberia. If hi-tech measurements prove Greenland's socket is attached to the ridge, they are in business. "We must be able to argue that it is a natural extension of Greenland," she says.

In the lobby of her offices at the Geological Survey of Greenland and Denmark (GEUS), there is a mechanical reminder of what they are working towards. A giant Foucault's pendulum is patiently tracking the rotation of the Earth around its South and North Pole axis. So far, no nation has actually secured territorial rights to either but the dawning of 2005 means the clock is ticking. That is the deadline for the Danish parliament to ratify the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The 1986 treaty affords coastal countries an economic zone extending 370km from their shores. If the socket is part of Greenland, then the North Pole could be part of Denmark.

"In 100 or 150 years, the ice may have melted significantly, making the area available for ships," Ms Dahl Jensen says. "This may seem far away, but in 10 years we will lose the right to make any territorial claims whatsoever."

The scientific work has to be completed within 10 years from the date that Denmark ratifies the UN convention. Ms Dahl-Jensen and her team have been given pounds 14m in government grants for a project said by the Danish ministry of science to have "historic dimensions". The windfall budget is a dream come true. "In any other situation, we would never have received this kind of funding," she says.

At her desk in an overheated, cupboard-sized office lined with polar maps on both walls, the Danish scientist with her blonde hair and broad forehead looks a true descendant of her Viking forebears. Contrary to expectations, the main challenge her group faced this spring, on their first expeditions into the Polar Basin, was weather warmer than usual. "We need cold conditions, preferably between 30 to 40 degrees below," the geologist says. "We can't land helicopters on the ice, if there is too much water on it."

After landing and setting up camp, the team uses sonar equipment and audio waves produced by controlled explosions and air cannons to map out the sea bed. Some of the equipment is already in place along the northern shores of Greenland.

But there is a greater imperative behind the latest round of grandiose territorial claims than the workings of international law. The Inuit, who have lived for centuries in and around the Arctic Circle were among the first to notice it and they do not even have words for what they were seeing. Many indigenous languages have no vocabulary for the legions of animals, insects and plants that have advanced north as global warming melts the polar ice and invites forest to creep over the thawed tundra. "We can't even describe what we are seeing," says Sheila Watt-Cloutier, chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference which claims to represent more than 150,000 people across Canada, Alaska, Greenland and Russia.

An eight-nation report in November revealed that the Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet and that the North Pole could be ice-free in summertime by the end of the century. Around the Arctic, salmon are moving up into more northerly waters, hornets are beginning to buzz and barn owls are appearing in regions where indigenous people have never seen a barn. The Arctic report said polar bears were "unlikely to survive as a species" if the ice disappeared and they were left to compete with their better-adapted brown and grizzly cousins.

What is for some an environmental catastrophe might be a great commercial opportunity. Diamond finds in Canada's Nunavut have already fired a mining rush and propelled the country into the ranks of a top-three producer. Ottawa is counting on tapping what the government suspects are major natural gas reserves in the Beaufort Sea, the frigid zone bordering the Yukon and Alaska, where diplomatic swords were crossed with the US when it tried unsuccessfully to auction off the area to oil companies last year. The companies reportedly balked at the prospect of finding their purchases challenged in an international squabble.

What no one disagrees with is the riches that would come from the thaw creating a north-west passage. The centuries old bane of Arctic explorers could become a reality thanks to global warming, cutting thousands of miles off the shipping routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, and delivering a windfall to any country able to tax its users.

In August, Canada spent C$ 4.9m (pounds 2.2m) in a show of force, sending hundreds of troops, helicopters, a frigate and an ice-breaker on a training exercise in search of mock satellite debris. Bad weather grounded planes, two soldiers were lost for a night and a fire on an ageing Sea King helicopter exposed the limits of the present force. This year, the government has approved the launching of the Radarsat II to provide high-resolution surveillance across the Arctic and monitor ships on the surface.

Canada's Defence Minister, Bill Graham, was well aware global warming has added a new urgency to claims in the Arctic. " It has created new possibilities and new threats," he told The New York Times. "We need more resources up there and we are going to look for ways to deploy them. The sense is that now is the time." The government has allocated C$ 70m for its own underwater mapping. One Canadian diplomat says: "To stake a territorial claim, you must be able to demonstrate you can actively patrol and enforce it, if necessary militarily."

Beneath the pack ice are the nuclear submarines of Russia, patrolling the dark water. Moscow has already made a failed attempt to stake its own claim to the Lomonosov Ridge, and thereby to the North Pole.

Faced with a common enemy, Canada and Denmark have begun to negotiate to fund a joint programme, which will divide the hefty expenses. Kai Sorensen, the deputy director of GEUS, says Denmark and Canada share a common interest in arguing that the natural divide of the North Pole is formed by the Lomonosov Ridge, which creates a natural median line between Canada, Greenland and across the North Pole to Russian territory.

Moscow has based claims on the so-called sector principle. A division along the median line would give Denmark territorial rights to the North Pole in accordance with the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea, but the sector principle would divide the North Pole along sectors formed by longitudes, thus splitting the Pole into several territories.

That has not stopped the Danes getting excited. "The North Pole is one of the only virgin territories left on the globe," says Torquil Meedon, a senior official at Denmark's ministry of science and technology. "Climate changes indicate that ice in the Polar Sea may disappear within 50 to 100 years. That will open up the North-west Passage as a new and valuable shipping route. It will also be open to fishing, and the oil and gas reserves which may prove significant. Who knows how valuable the rights to the North Pole could be 100 years from now?"

Denmark feels it has been left behind by its neighbours. Norway, once a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, is now the world's number three oil- exporting nation, but Danes have been bystanders. Once, the Viking influence stretched from the Baltic across the North Sea and even, some historians say, across the Atlantic.

Now the Danes are eyeing the chance of taking the lead in what they hope could become the fossil fuel bonanza of the 21st century. But not all those leading the scramble agree that victory will make the winner rich. Ms Dahl-Jensen says there is no solid evidence to suggest the area of 200,000sq km will contain any wealth of natural resources.

Just as in long-gone eras, the race to claim new territory is, in large part, about regaining long-lost status. "It is all surreal," says Ole Kvaerno, director of the Institute of Strategy and Political Science at the Royal Danish Defence College, who finds the sudden territorial ambitions amusing."Strategically speaking, the North Pole is unimportant. It's not at all like Greenland." The US-controlled Thule air base has been a vital listening and patrol post between east and west throughout the Cold War.

"It really strikes me that various nations have begun to make these impossible territorial claims," he says. "What will be the next territorial claim: space? If Denmark gains territorial rights according to the UN convention, we would control the seabed and any resources beneath. In this case, we would have to make regular flights in the area to make sure nobody puts up unwanted oilrigs. It would be very expensive, but not impossible."

With bragging rights to one of the last, great, unexplored territories at stake not everyone is being rational. Mr Kvaernoe smiles wryly, and shrugs. "The North Pole; it sounds pretty cool, doesn't it?"


Not a Single National Reserve Was Set Up in Russia Since 2000
RIA Novosti, December 29, 2004

Moscow -- Not a single national reserve or park was set up in Russia in the past four years, merited ecologist of Russia Vsevolod Stepanitsky, former head of a department at the state nature protection agencies, told journalists today. "The last breakthrough in the development of protected areas was made 50 years ago," he said.

Viktor Danilov-Danilyan, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said attempts have been made in the past few years to illegally transfer a part of 13 reserve territories to economic cultivation. "Regrettably, state agencies cannot, and frequently do not want to, take measures to protect reserves."
There are 95 state reserves, 35 national parks and 11 federal preserves in Russia, which occupy about 3% of the national territory and are located mostly in European Russia and in southern areas of the Far East. Their aggregate personnel is more than 10,000.

A group of 28 reserves are part of the international network of biospheric reserves involved in global ecological monitoring. Nearly all of the Russian reserves are subordinate to the Department of Protected Territories and Facilities at the National Resources Ministry. The Barguzin reserve set up in 1917 is the first officially registered state reserve.


Russian Coal Region Governor Says Output Boost to Be Curbed by Eco-Concern. BBC Monitoring International Reports, December 28, 2004
Source: Radio Russia, Moscow, in Russian 1030 gmt 28 Dec 04

Kemerovo Region is to curb increases in coal output to address environmental concerns, the region's governor Aman Tuleyev said in a telephone interview given to Radio Russia's "At first hand" on 28 December. He also spoke of his reservations about the new law allowing the president to appoint regional leaders.

Tuleyev began the interview with host Natalya Bekhtina by saying it had been in some ways "a difficult year" for his coal-mining region. He recalled that there had been three pit tragedies during the year. At the same time, overall it had been "a year of creating, a year of great labour and records", the governor said.

Coal industry: Tuleyev noted that for the first time in 15 years the region had achieved coal production of 157m tonnes. He added that nine new coal enterprises had been opened, which means 4,500 new jobs. In addition, R14bn had been spent on modernizing plant, he told Bekhtina.

However, the main success had been to "conquer global markets", Tuleyev said. After all, the governor pointed out, the key thing is not to mine coal but to sell it. He said that an important factor contributing to this success had been the building of coal terminals in various parts of Russia.

Tuleyev recalled that he had told President Putin recently that whatever other concerns the head of state might have he could rest easy about coal. "Russia is fully stocked with coal," Tuleyev stressed. He also drew attention to the fact that Kemerovo Region was the only area in Russia to increase its coal production this year.

However, there are problems, especially environmental ones, the governor said. "The length of our rivers has decreased by something like 100 km, and 200 rivers have been ruined, " Tuleyev noted, adding that 65,000 ha of land has to be reclaimed and recultivated after being exploited by mining.

Tuleyev said that in view of these environmental concerns coal production should not be pushed beyond 170m tonnes a year. At the same time, he stressed the need to adjust the region's economic strategy away from simply mining coal to processing it so that it can sold at higher prices.

Money should be channelled into projects to rehabilitate land, forests and rivers, the governor said. He went on to stress the importance of agriculture in the regional economy, saying that Kemerovo Region needed to produce at least 1m tonnes of grain. This year the region produced over 1.3m tonnes, he added.

New law on appointing governors; Asked about the change in the law on the appointment of governors, Tuleyev said he would not be trying to challenge it. "Now the law has been passed, I'm a loyal soldier. You have to implement a law that has been passed," he commented. At the same time, in the new conditions governors need some sort of protection from bureaucratic corruption in Moscow, he argued.


WB Ready to Allocate Grants for Ecological Projects in Russia
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 20, 2004

The World Bank is ready to allocate grants for the implementation of ecological projects in Russia, the WB director for Russia, Kristalina Georgieva, told the Prime-Tass news agency on Monday.

According to the WB official, there are several funds within the World Bank with a total amount of 800 million dollars, which extend grants for ecological projects. Such projects are actively implemented in Latin American countries.

Besides, the World Bank is ready to provide Russian companies with technologies for the assessment of ecological projects and their conformity with global international relations in ecological issues.

Within the framework of negotiations with the Russian government, the World Bank can offer a system for monitoring carbon emissions into the atmosphere to assess Russia's possibilities for trading emission quotas. According to Georgieva, this market is estimated for Russia at dozens of billions of dollars.

As for projects for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the World Bank has experience in the marketing of remaining quotas for greenhouse emissions. In particular, the World Bank can help concrete enterprises, cities and municipalities implement projects for the reduction of greenhouse emissions, their efforts financed by the funds formed by companies from other countries, which may obtain certificates and thus some of the quotas.

She said the Unified Energy Systems of Russia demonstrates interest for such projects, as it can transfer some electric power stations for geothermal sources instead of liquid fuel.

According to Georgieva, the money Russia can get within the framework of quotas, can be channeled into the sphere of power industry and for the updating of infrastructure.


Norway, Russia Attach Importance to Environmental Cooperation
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 8, 2004
By Nikolai Gorbunov

Oslo -- The Norwegian government attaches great importance to cooperation in environmental protection with Russia, Norwegian Minister for Environmental Protection Knut Arild Hareide said on Wednesday in connection with the tenth anniversary of the Russian-Norwegian "Clean production" ecological program.

Norway has invested 53 million crowns ($8.5 million) for the program's implementation in Russia over the past ten years. Many enterprises have started producing "cleaner" products in ecological terms. More than 1,500 engineers have been retrained, toxic emissions in the atmosphere have been cut. "Norway will continue supporting the implementation of such programs in Russia," Hareide emphasized.


Russia, France to Set Up Joint Lab in Antarctica
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 6, 2004

By Daria Tokareva

Russian and French researchers will set up a network of joint laboratories for work in promising directions, including in the Antarctica.

Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolai Platte and French Ambassador to Russia Jean Kades on Monday signed seven agreements on cooperation in the field of science and research and on the establishment of research centers I the field of chemistry, physics, mathematics and environmental studies.

"An entire network of joint laboratories will be created, one of them in the frame of a global warming research project, which will study carbon and ozone climate cycles in Siberia," Nikolai Plate said at the signing.

According to him, Russia and French researchers will also "drill through the glacier atop Lake Vostok on the icy continent at the South Pole for the purpose of climatologic studies."

The Russian Academy vice-president stressed, "The agreements will not only consolidate Russian-French scientific ties but also expand the common scientific space between Russia and Europe."

German and French researchers will take part in the implementation of two of the seven joint projects. Earlier this year, a Russian-French convention was signed in Paris concerning joint work in prospecting for, and developing deposits of metals, according to sources at the Russian Academy of Sciences. French and Russian specialists have set up a joint center for work in this direction.

The steering committee for cooperation of Russia with the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) decided at its recent meeting to expand cooperation of Russia's state higher schools with the world leading scientific research centers.

"Young Russian scientists will conduct research and studies at major international venues , and postgraduate students from Germany and France will come to Russia in the nearest future to defend their research theses," an official at the Russian Education and Science Ministry told Itar-Tass.


Space Photographs to Help Curb Timber Theft in Russia
RIA Novosti, December 02, 2004

Moscow -- Russia will use space photographing to fight timber theft. Mr. Valery Roshchupkin, head of the Federal Timber Agency, said a system of operational monitoring, in particular space and aerial photographing, will be employed soon to fight timber theft.

"At first, we will control a million hectares and spread the system to the whole of the national territory within three years," Mr. Roshchupkin told the newspaper Vedomosti.

In his words, modern military projects will be used for the purpose. Five processing stations will be set up in the Khabarovsk territory, the Novosibirsk region, the Krasnoyarsk territory, the Vologda region and in St. Petersburg or Karelia.

"Our aerial and space photographs will be used as proof in court trials of timber theft," he said. The agency head also called for raising timber export duties. He thinks it is not right that export duties on many kinds of deep-processed timber commodities are higher than the export duties on coniferous and broadleaf felled timber.

"Timber export duties should be raised in a differentiated manner," Mr. Roshchupkin said. "The top rate should be set for sawn timber, plywood and veneer sheets."
He believes that this will have a positive effect on the work of Russian sawmills and plywood companies, many of which are seriously short of raw materials.


Russia to Certify 0.3 Percent of Wood in 2004
RIA Novosti, December 03, 2004

Moscow -- Roman Shipov, adviser of the federal forestry agency chief, has reported about 0.3 percent of the entire wooded area in Russia to have been certified in 2004.

"Some 2.2 million hectares of forests have been already certified while the certification of another two million hectares is nearing completion. This means that about 0.3 percent of the entire area under forests in Russia will be certified in 2004," said Roman Shipov.

As of today, 150 million hectares of woods have been certified throughout the world, which constitutes 0.3 percent of their total area. Such countries with developed ecological legislation as Finland, Germany, Austria and Sweden have already certified 100 percent of the area under woods.

In Russia, most intense certification has swept the Arkhangelsk region, the Komi republic, the Irkutsk region and Krasnoyarsk territory. Voluntary forest certification in Russia has been since 2003 the responsibility of the national council for forest certification founded by agencies representing the government, business, science and public.

Adjustment, approbation and registering of documents on voluntary forest certification are planned for 2005 while the wide introduction of this system is scheduled for 2006, said Shipov. A forest certificate is a permit to utilize forests and an obligation on their restoration. Not only does certification confirm the legality of timber origin, it hampers the illegal felling of woods.


Russia to Give Attention to Sustained Development in Arctic ITAR-TASS News Agency, November 24, 2004 By Mikhail Petrov

Reikjavik -- Russia that now presides over the Arctic Council is going to give special attention to ensuring sustained development in the Arctic, the development of the Arctic infrastructure, the problems of the indigenous peoples and the restoration of the Arctic environment, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday following the meeting of the Arctic Council at which Russia took over the presidency of the council.

"We will concentrate the attention on ensuring sustained development in the Arctic and the implementation of the provisions of the Action Plan adopted by the meeting, Lavrov said. He expressed the confidence that the St Petersburg forum, to be held in the summer of next year, would contribute to this work. The forum under the auspices of the Federation Council upper house of Russian parliament will concentrate on cooperation in the North.

"We will give much attention to the development of the Arctic infrastructure, including the development of sea shipping, specifically along the Arctic route", Lavrov said, setting out Russia's priorities as president of the council.

There is a need to improve the situation of the indigenous peoples of the North, which is connected with the ecological situation in the Arctic, the minister said. "The preservation and restoration of the Arctic environment comes to the fore", he said. A report assessing the consequences of the development of deposits of hydrocarbon raw materials in the Arctic is being drafted, he said. "This will be one of the main questions of the session of the Arctic Council in 2006", Lavrov said.

"We will also be pressing for stepped up efforts within the Action Plan to fight pollution in the Arctic and to implement the recommendations of the report on the climate change in the region", Lavrov said. "Russia will advance specific projects for cooperation to increase the use of its initiatives, specifically for reacting to emergency situations, Arctic rescue plan", the minister said.


Russia, UN to Develop Ecological Cooperation
RIA Novosti, November 24, 2004

Moscow -- Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Executive Director Klaus Topfer discussed Russia-UN ecological cooperation in Iceland's capital Reykjavik during the 4th session of the council of ministers of the Arctic Council, the Foreign Ministry's information and press department reported.

In particular, the sides discussed the support for the Russian program on the protection of the Arctic Council and the launch of the project on the account for climate changes in the management of water resources of the Lena and other Siberian rivers. The sides agreed to develop further active cooperation in this sphere, the Foreign Ministry said.

Mr. Topfer highly assessed Russia's decision to ratify the Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, after which this important multilateral ecological document comes into effect.

The Arctic Council is an international regional structure aimed to promote cooperation in the sphere of environmental protection and provide stable development of polar areas. The declaration on its formation was signed in Ottawa (Canada) on September 19, 1996 by eight Artic countries: Denmark, Iceland, Canada, Norway, Russia, the United States, Finland and Sweden.

Chairmen of the Arctic Council are appointed for two years on the rotation basis. In late October 2004 Russia replaced Iceland as the Council's chairman.


Russia to Head Arctic Council for Two Years
ITAR-TASS News Agency, November 24, 2004

By Nikolai Gorbunov

The Arctic Council, a high-level intergovernmental forum that provides a mechanism to address the common concerns and challenges faced by the Arctic governments and the people of the Arctic, is to hold a ministerial-level meeting in Reykjavik beginning on Wednesday.

Sergey Lavrov, the foreign affairs minister of the Russian Federation, represents Russia, the country that will take over the presidency of the Arctic Council from Norway for the next two years.

Norwegian foreign Jan Petersen has stressed the importance of discussing climate issues at the meeting that opens on Wednesday. He stresses in the statement released by the Norwegian foreign ministry, "The report about climate changes in the Arctic paints a very serious picture; its consequences can be very dramatic. It is obvious that that climate changes are among the most serious challenges to the North."

The Norwegian foreign minister points out that all eight member-states of the Arctic Council must step up their contribution to emitting global discharges into the atmosphere."

According to him, the meeting in Reykjavik will consider cooperation in the field of environmental protection and sustainable development in the Arctic.


Dam to Save Kazakh Part of Aral to Be Completed Next Year
BBC Monitoring International Reports, November 23, 2004

Source: Khabar Television, Almaty, in Russian 1500 gmt 22 Nov 04.
(Presenter) Work to save the Small Aral is continuing in (southern) Kyzylorda Region. The building of a dam on the left bank of the Aral has been completed and the building of the dam's second part is continuing. Experts say the dam will help raise the level of water in the northern Aral.

(Correspondent, over video of bulldozers and people at work) The Aral Sea will be divided by a 13-km-long dam. When its construction is complete specialists will manage to keep the water within the small Aral and raise its level considerably. The 10-km-section of the dam is on the left bank and its construction is already complete and now only three kilometres of the dam on the right bank need to be completed. In accordance with the plans, it should be completed by next summer.

(Aytbay Kosherbayev, captioned as chief engineer of the project to regulate the bed of the Syr Darya river and preserve the northern Aral) The main job is to block this canal. This will make it possible for us to raise the water level in the Small Aral and direct the discharge of water from the Small Aral to the Large Aral via the hydraulic power system which is being built (sentence as heard).

(Correspondent) The building of the dam has revived the entire region. Over 400 people are working on the site. First, contractors used to bring workers but this year locals are involved in the construction.

A town of engineers has emerged near the dam. Specialists will come here to regulate the work of the hydraulic facilities. The Committee for Water Management has allocated over 200m tenge (1.5m dollars) to build a road linking the residential areas of Karateren and Zhana Kurylys. Building materials will be transported using this road. Locals are glad because this will solve another problem.

(Imangali Duysengaliyev, captioned as the director of the Akbasty fish breeding farm) This road will be very helpful to us because being unable to pass through the mud in winter and summer, we used to spend two or three hours bypassing it. Now it takes us only 20 minutes. It has become easier to access the markets in Kazalinsk and Aralsk.

(Correspondent) The dam in the Small Aral is the main part of the project to regulate the bed of the Syr Darya river and preserve the northern Aral, which was launched last spring. The funds to carry out the building, the total cost of which is 86m dollars, was allocated by the World Bank. It is expected that the hydraulic facility Akvak that will link the two sides of the dam will start operating in November next year. The level of water will then rise up to 42 metres in accordance with the Baltic system, specialists say. If everything goes in line with the plan the sea will then approach the town of Aralsk by as close as up to 13 km. Foreign journalists have already described the project as the construction of the century.


Russia Lower House Passes New Chapter to Land Code
ITAR-TASS News Agency, November 23, 2004

Russian parliament's lower house passed an additional chapter on the land tax in the Russian Land Code on Tuesday.A conference commission proposed the amended edition of the code.

The State Duma passed a law amending the Land Code on October 29, but the Federation Council, the upper house, turned it down on November 10, offering to set up a conference commission.

The new edition of the law stipulates that land taxes will be reduced 10,000 roubles per tax payers in municipalities, in particular the federal cities of Moscow and St. Petersburg, if a land plot is permanently owned or inherited by a citizen who is entitled for social benefits under a law on social guarantees for citizens who were exposed to radiation as a consequence of nuclear tests at the Semipalatinsk testing ground.

The land tax is to be paid by organizations and individuals who are in business in the first quarter, half-year and at nine months of a calendar year.

Under the new edition, organisations of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, the Russian Academy of Education and the Russian Academy of Arts that have land under their buildings used for scientific purposes are exempt from this tax.


Government Must Monitor Hydrocarbons Extraction in Arctic
RIA Novosti, November 18, 2004
Murmansk -- According to Academician Gennady Matishov, Director of the Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, permitting oil extraction at the Arctic shelf without a comprehensive state ecosystem monitoring would amount to a crime.

Dr Matishov takes part in the second international conference "Oil and gas of the Arctic shelf 2004" that opened Wednesday in the capital of the Murmansk region on the Barents Sea coast.

According to him, before starting development of the shelf oilfields, it is necessary to restore ecosystem monitoring at least at the scale existing in the 1960s and 1970s.

"At that time the Meteorological Service, the Academy of Sciences and the military had research flotillas of their own and monitored the situation; their data was accumulated and analyzed, and we had a state monitoring system, but nothing of this exists now", - Matishov said.

Today oil companies do invest in environmental research, he noted, but they are doing it only at the plots they develop, and the allocated funds are quite insignificant.

According to the Academician, it is necessary to establish a system creating incentives for private oil companies to invest money in state monitoring.

There has been no serious progress in this direction at the state level so far, he emphasized. To preserve the Arctic ecosystem, according to Matishov, it is also necessary to establish an effective state emergency rescue service to deal with oil spills in blue water and ice covered areas. "Such a service should be created under the state's aegis, as no private structure will be willing to take care of this", - Matishov explained.Recruitment of highly trained personnel by agencies controlling the environmental situation in the region, he added, should constitute the third important element of the environmental monitoring system. "Unfortunately, these specialists' professional level has declined sharply in recent years, which, in the long run, inevitably affects the quality of their work", - Matishov said.

According to the Academician, oil spills in ice-bound Arctic constitute the main potential danger of shelf oilfields' development. "Oil spills can't be avoided: international practice shows that the level of accidents in oil production is about 1 per cent", - Matishov emphasized. According to him, oil spills in ice-bound areas are especially dangerous for rookeries.

The conference "Oil and gas of the Arctic shelf 2004" is taking place in Murmansk on November 17-18. It is attended by some 500 representatives of the relevant agencies, organizations and companies from 10 countries. The first international conference "Oil and gas of the Arctic shelf" was held in Murmansk in 2002.


Chukotka Coasts Heavily Polluted with Persistent Toxic Agents
ITAR-TASS News Agency, November 17, 2004

By Ivan Novikov The coastal districts of the Chukchi peninsula are heavier polluted with persistent toxic agents (PTA) than other Arctic regions, prominent polar explorer Artur Chilingarov, the deputy speaker of the State Duma lower house of Russian parliament, said on Wednesday. He presided over the coordination conference in the house on the subject "The global pollution and the health of the indigenous peoples of Russia's North".

Chiingarov said the project of the Global ecological foundation for the reduction of contamination of the Arctic studied the spread of PTA to areas inhabited by the indigenous peoples of the North, the level of such pollutants in the human organisms, and the degree of the contamination of the environment and biological species that are the source of traditional foods of the indigenous peoples of the North. Russia takes an active part in the project, Chilingarov said.

Researchers have arrived at the conclusion that PTA are very harmful for indigenous peoples of the North. The highest hazards in the Arctic are registered in the coastal regions of Chukotka where traditional rations of the population are based on game and sea fish, Chilingarov said.

On the basis of the project, the State Duma will work out the joint action plan of the executive authorities, the health services, bodies for environmental protection and the Association of indigenous ethnic minorities of the North, Siberia and the Far East to lessen the impact of PTA on the health of the indigenous population of the Arctic regions, the Duma deputy speaker said. Besides, seminars will be held in the first half of 2005 to suggest specific measures at the local level to improve the situation.


Major Russian River Suffers Heavily from Pollution - TV Report
BBC Monitoring International Reports, November 16, 2004

Source: Channel One TV, Moscow, in Russian 0600 gmt 16 Nov 04

(Presenter) The Volga has become dangerous. The water in the river has been poisoned and is not suitable for use in water supply systems, environmentalists have officially announced. Constant accidents on tankers and emissions from major enterprises each day turn the Volga into a kind of sewer. Scientists and Emergencies Ministry workers are battling to keep the river clean but their efforts are in vain. The river's cleaning facilities have almost reached the end of their life-span. Tatyana Zemskovaya has the details.

(Correspondent) This is not a fire, it is a rescue operation; or, to be more exact, an operation to prevent an environmental catastrophe. For two weeks Emergencies Ministry workers have been collecting fuel oil spilt onto surface of the water. The leak was from the General Gorbatov, a decommissioned ship towed to the Volga gulf five years ago. All this time 50 t of fuel has been stored in the abandoned ship's tanks. Special floating barriers have been set up in the gulf to clean up after accident and prevent the fuel oil from being carried off by the Volga's current. The fuel that is left on the ship has to be burnt off.

Environmentalists say that the whole periodic table of the elements can be found in the Volga. (Viktor Yegorov, environmentalist) As a rule, waste water from the city and from industrial enterprises is released into the surface waters without being cleaned.

(Correspondent) This water enters the water supply system directly from the river. It is a murky, yellowish liquid with an unpleasant smell. Before entering residents' taps it has to go through at least four purification stages and be chlorinated twice. Measurements taken from samples differ from standards several times over. In the near future drinking water standards are to rise to European levels. The water services of all towns along the Volga will face serious problems. Water containing traces of oil, phenols and heavy metals will have to be cleaned at 40-year-old facilities.

(Video shows oil spill, clean-up operation, oil being burnt off, water cleaning facilities, yellow samples of river water)


Putin Signs Bill Confirming Russia's Ratification of Kyoto Protocol
The Associated Press, November 5, 2004
By Vladimir Isachenkov

President Vladimir Putin signed a bill confirming Russia's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, the Kremlin said Friday, clearing the way for the global climate pact to come into force early next year.

Both houses of parliament last month ratified the protocol, which aims to stem global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Putin signed the bill on Thursday, the Kremlin said.

Without Russia's support, the pact - which has been rejected by the United States and Australia - could not have come into effect. It needed endorsement by 55 industrialized nations accounting for at least 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions in 1990.

The United States alone accounted for 36 percent of carbon dioxide emissions in 1990, while Russia accounted for 17 percent. Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi praised Russia's move as "a fresh start for policies to combat global warming. I warmly welcome it."

British Prime Minister Tony Blair also hailed Russia's ratification.

"I welcome the leadership of President Putin and his government on this critical global issue," Blair said. He added that he looked forward to working with Putin during Britain's presidency of the Group of Eight industrialized nations next year, "when climate change will be a major theme."

After years of hesitation, Putin pledged in May to speed up approval in return for the European Union's support of Russia's bid to join the World Trade Organization. The 1997 pact will take effect 90 days after Russia notifies the United Nations of its ratification.

Japanese Environment Minister Yuriko Koike said Tuesday that Tokyo - one of the pact's biggest promoters - would "continuously urge the United States, Australia and other countries which have not ratified the protocol" to do so.

The approval followed fierce debates among Russian officials. Opponents, led by Putin's economic adviser Andrei Illarionov, warned that it would stymie the nation's economic growth. Kyoto backers, however, rejected the claim, saying that even after a five-year recovery, the post-Soviet economic meltdown has left emissions 30 percent below the baseline.

Russian officials have voiced hope that the treaty's provisions allowing countries to trade greenhouse gas emission allowances would enable Moscow to attract foreign investment for its crumbling industries.

Under the treaty, Russia can sell unused emissions credits to countries that have exceeded their limits. Once the deal takes effect, industrialized countries will have until 2012 to cut their collective emissions of six key greenhouse gases to 5.2 percent below the 1990 level. Greenhouse gases are believed to trap heat in the atmosphere, warming the Earth and changing the climate.

The next round of international climate talks is scheduled for next month in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and negotiations on curbing emissions after 2012 are due to start next year.

Russia's parliament has said that Moscow's decision on post-2012 emission cuts would be contingent on the outcome of those talks.


Kyoto Protocol: Russia's Position
RIA Novosti, November 05, 2004
By Nina Kulikova

Moscow -- The Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing industrial gas emissions into the atmosphere was ratified in Russia by the State Duma, endorsed by the Federation Council and signed by the Russian Federation's president on November 5.

Below, Vsevolod Gavrilov, deputy director of the economic development and trade ministry's (MERT's) department for property and land relations and the economics of nature management, explains Russia's position on the Kyoto Protocol.

Which are the terms for Russia's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol?
The Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997. It provides for the need to work out more technical documents. The documents were drafted with a Russian delegation's active participation (Marrakesh Accords) and we managed to stand up for the positions acceptable to us on many issues governing the compliance mechanisms and commitments. This work was carried out from 2000 to 2003. No changes are to be made in the documents during the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol.

Question: What does the Kyoto Protocol mean for the Russian economy?
Answer: Usually, this question implies one thing: whether it will do good or harm to the Russian economy. In my opinion, it will do no harm. It depends on us whether it will benefit Russia or not. The mandate of the Kyoto Protocol's ratification extends to the period until 2012. By all kinds of forecasts, till the end of that period, no harm will be done to the Russian economy in the form of limitations to economic growth. At the same time, there are some other commitments on the Kyoto Protocol and Russia has to meet them. With regard to Article 2, we must implement a national policy of measures aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emission in Russia. On Article 5, we must create a system of assessing greenhouse gas emissions and absorption. As regards Article 7, we must compile a cadastre of industrial enterprises. Surely, this will cost money, but the formation of these institutions and this potential will be useful for Russia.

Question: Will Russia become a party to the Kyoto Protocol after 2012?
Answer: So far, it has not yet been decided and it cannot be decided since there is no formula for determining commitments for the period after 2012. This will be a matter to be discussed at international negotiations. It depends on whether we shall manage to protect our interests or not. Then we shall think if it is worth while to join the next period.

Question: What is to be done to go over from a "no harm" to a "benefit" stage?
Answer: It depends on how we shall build out national policy and international negotiating processes. It also depends on whether the state will be able to maximise the potential advantages of Russia's accession to the Kyoto Protocol for promoting Russian economic interests. The main thing is to form our internal policy and make the Kyoto Protocol's mechanisms a natural continuation of the country's internal policy.

What is to be done to achieve this? "Industrial countries that have committed themselves to the Kyoto Protocol have introduced restrictions on greenhouse gas emission. They have restricted the emission limits for their enterprises and are imposing heavy fines for non-compliance. Under the European Union regulations, till 2008 any enterprise will pay 40 Euros for each (metric) ton of carbon dioxide emitted beyond the individual quota. When you burn down about half a ton of coal, you produce one ton of carbon dioxide. In 2008-2010, the fine for non-compliance will rise to 100 Euros per ton. However, we cannot impose such fines in Russia."
"What are you proposing to do in this country?"
"We are proposing to make it in two stages: at the first stage, we will support those industry operators who will restrict their greenhouse gas emission limits on their own accord. We are considering, for example, an option of granting such businesses access to tenders for quotas that will enable them to develop projects eventually diminishing their greenhouse gas emission. To make these tenders as transparent as possible, we are going to qualify the applicants by a single quantitative criterion and make the tenders online and real-time. We do not plan to impose fines for abstention from the program.

"When the first option is fully exhausted - which will happen no one knows when, maybe in several years, maybe in many years - a decision will be made whether it is viable to make the obligations binding and compulsory. Having repeatedly discussed the issue with the entrepreneurial community, we can say that businesses' response has been ambivalent because the challenge is strong. What we will do some day is arrange Russian national procedures similar to those of the Kyoto Protocol - something the EU member states have already ventured to do, - but we will postpone decisions on such issues as obligations and liabilities. If we are successful enough in our foreign policies, we would be able to sell our quotas [abroad] at a good price to turn a "no-harm" agenda into a profit.

"You have mentioned that businesses' response to proposals on voluntary commitment to emission restrictions has been ambivalent. Energy operators have endorsed the move, while steelworks stood up to it, I guess?"
"It was not so well defined as you say. All businesses to my knowledge will endorse participation in Kyoto Protocol procedures, and so do the steelworks, if the state takes on a consistent policy. While the EU thinks that one can regulate businesses individually, imposing strict regulations, we have said and will further argue that for us such a move is not on the table so far. We will consider and discuss the necessity of emission restrictions and, accordingly, liabilities for non-compliance, only in close contact with businesses, without any state unilateralism. It is in this manner that we would like to launch a civilized national ecological policy. We are contacting with business people on a day-to-day basis, and, as far as I know, none of them has revealed any fierce opposition. Everyone is aware that this policy, if organized properly, is a friend, rather than a foe."
"Is this really the basic reason for such loyalty? Maybe many enterprises just have emission much lower than in 1990, which they are not likely to restore until 2012?"
"Russia is considering a reform of industrial infrastructure. On the whole, a more liberal energy market will be the primary factor of energy saving. In modern times, neglecting fuel saving is something not everyone can afford. This is right because fuel is a resource that should be spent wisely. Therefore, it would be incorrect to say that an enterprise that endorses the program today because its emission is lower than in 1990 will necessarily stand up to it if its emission will exceed the 1990 level in 2012. An enterprise pursuing a deliberate emission reduction policy, including new know-how and reduction of energy losses, can well be eligible for membership in all programs, irrespective of whether its actual emission is higher or lower than in 1990."
"What are the prospects of selling Russia's greenhouse gas emission quotas abroad?"
"We are developing relevant documents, so I cannot say what the exact procedure is going to be but I can outline how it is going to work. Basically, the Russian system of selling quotas for emission of industrial gas under the Kyoto Protocol has to be as transparent as possible, while the current quota trading market is largely speculative and its future is uncertain. There is a package of technological documents - the so-called "Marrakesh Agreements" - that are to come into force after the Kyoto Protocol is ratified. These Agreements stipulate how a normal liquid market is to be developed, and how the commodity to be bought and sold on this market is to be defined. The capacity of the market will depend on the behavior of the operators. Currently all countries seek to create it as a market of quotas secured by real reduction of greenhouse gas emission, rather than just a quota trading pad. Our stance is to pool our efforts with other countries to see to it that quotas sold in this market result in real reduction of greenhouse gas emission."
"Who will operate on the market?"
"The arrangement of the quota market is still underway. The market should include institutional investors who have invested in businesses related to energy saving, and specific enterprises where such projects are to be developed. The quota market should become affiliated with the current investment market. A combination of a traditional money market and a new carbon market might give a cumulative impact because the quota market will in effect sponsor energy-efficient and energy-saving projects, and stimulate the traditional investment market to engage in such projects."
"Where will the money for sold quotas go?"
"All this money should be transferred back to businesses - absolutely transparently if possible, via clear-cut procedures. At the same time, managing the money belonging to the Russian Federation, one should remember that all obligations are secured by the assets of the sovereign, which is the Russian federal budget. Accordingly, membership in quota trading programs will require guarantees to the Russian state that the projects would be implemented on specific terms. If we don't take security from the businesses, then the federal budget, that is, all taxpayers will be left liable for their compliance."
"Who will be in charge with inspecting businesses for compliance with these obligations?"
"All obligations are rather easy and simple to administer. Compliance with emission reduction regulations is easy to verify through fuel consumption records. To administer fuel consumption is piece of cake for environmental inspections, taxation authorities, and statistical bodies. The administration procedure is being developed by our counterparts in the Russian Natural Resources Ministry; they are supposed to come up with a suitable combination involving all the three competent authorities. We have a tall order to create a market with diminished risk of corruption and as little government leverage in distributing quotas and preferences as possible. A market is healthy only when officials have minimal leverage in it, while to make a transparent and effective market is what we are supposed to do."


Forest Fires Push Air Pollution Up in Russian Far East
BBC Monitoring International Reports, October 19, 2004

Khabarovsk -- Smoke from forest fires in Amur Region and the Jewish Autonomous Region has caused a sharp deterioration in air quality in the Far East. The levels of sulphur and nitrogen dioxide, formaldehyde, nitric oxide and other harmful substances are much higher than permitted.

Presidential envoy to the Far Eastern Federal District Konstantin Pulikovskiy has drawn attention to the poor environmental situation in the region. He said that the air is most polluted in Khabarovsk. There is also a high level of air pollution in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, where the level of formaldehyde is six times as high as permitted. Air quality is also unsatisfactory in Magadan, Blagoveshchensk, Yakutsk and Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy.

Pulikovskiy drew the attention of the heads of local government bodies, major enterprises and other structures to the need to continually monitor the environmental situation and take into account information from meteorologist.


Over 30,000 Oak Seedlings to Be Planted in Ugra National Park
ITAR-TASS News Agency, September 19, 2004

Over 30,000 three-year oak seedlings will be planted in the Ugra National Park this year, World Wildlife Fund's Yelena Kulikova said on Sunday. "The original beauty of Ugra will be restored in several decades," she said.

"The national park begins a zone of broadleaves forests, which are made up of limes, ashes, maples and oaks," Ugra chief forester Viktor Grishenkov told Itar-Tass. "Oak is a symbol of strength and long life, but it is actually one of the most fragile and vulnerable trees. The decline of oaks in Russia was swift in the second half of the 20th century, probably because of poor ecology, and, nowadays, oak forests are left only in the Far East and the Caucasus. Only 0.2% of oak forests are left in European countries," he said.

"Before the Tatar-Mongol invasion, the black earth zone of Russia was mostly made of oak forests," Grishenkov said. People had to fell oaks and dig trenches to protect themselves from the invaders, and timber was used in the construction of fortresses, he said.

The reconstruction of the Ugra National Party will take plenty of effort. "Oak seedlings need special care for at least ten years," Grishenkov said. He regressed that the national park does not have wild boars left. "They hoe soil well, and we could use that," he said.


Russia Set to Sign Kyoto Pact on Global Warming
The Times (London), September 24, 2004
By Jeremy Page in Moscow

Russia appeared to salvage the Kyoto Protocol yesterday when ministries started signing ratification documents after years of delay by Moscow over the global warming pact.

The protocol, which has depended on Russian approval since the withdrawal of the United States in 2001, could be ratified by the Duma, the Lower House of parliament, within the next few weeks. Environmental groups hailed the move as a breakthrough but said that powerful opponents of the Protocol, who fear it will limit Russia's economic development, would try to scupper ratification.

Aleksei Kokorin, the coordinator of the World Wide Fund for Nature's climate change programme in Moscow, told The Times: "It's a very positive sign. We have an official bureaucratic process of ratification. Personal intervention from the President was necessary to push the process."

The timing was apparently designed to boost Russia's international image amid growing criticism of President Putin's plans to tighten his control of parliament, analysts said. Signatories of the protocol are due to meet in Buenos Aires from December 6 to December 17 and had hoped Russia would know by then.

Under the protocol, industrialised nations will cut emissions of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases by 5.2per cent over those in 1990. They should achieve the cuts by 2008. The pact, signed in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, comes into force only if countries responsible for a total of 55per cent of global emissions ratify it.

The United States, which accounts for 35per cent of global emissions, rejected it in 2001 in one of President Bush's first decisions. That gave Russia, which accounts for 17.4per cent of global emissions, the deciding vote. In an attempt to rescue the agreement, the European Union offered huge concessions to Japan, Canada and Russia in 2001.

German Gref, the reformist Russian Minister of Economic Development and Trade, has argued that ratifying the protocol will help Russia to attract investment. His supporters say that emissions are still at least 25per cent lower than in 1990.

However, Andrei Illarionov, the outspoken Kremlin economic adviser, argues that Russia's emissions could reach 1990 levels by 2008, making it difficult to attract investment and sell excess emission quotas. He has compared the protocol to Nazism and has accused its proponents of waging an "undeclared war" against Russia to pursue colonial agendas.

Documents leaked this month showed that Mikhail Fradkov, the Prime Minister, and some ministries doubted Kyoto's scientific basis. Mr Putin promised in May, during World Trade Organisation accession negotiations with the EU, to accelerate the ratification process. The Natural Resources Ministry became the first to announce its approval.

The Duma is unlikely to oppose ratification as Mr Putin controls a majority of more than two thirds, analysts say. Mr Kokorin said: "It's not the end of the battle, but as long as the President sends a clear message that he wants it ratified, then I think it will go through."


Rivers Pollute Caspian Sea - Azeri Ecology Minister
BBC Monitoring International Reports, September 23, 2004

Baku -- The Caspian Sea is mainly contaminated by rivers that flow into it, and 70-75 per cent of contamination falls to the share of the Volga River, Azerbaijani Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources Huseyn Bagirov said in an interview with Turan. The Ural River, which flows through industrial areas, also brings a considerable volume of contaminated waters into the Caspian Sea.

The Kura is considerably polluted in Georgia while the Araz, which is the main tributary of the Kura, is contaminated in Armenia. Due to this, the concentration of heavy metals in the Kura exceeds the norm 20 times. All in all, 600m-700m cu.m. of untreated waters are discharged into the river every year.

Along with that, Bagirov said that Azerbaijan was the first littoral country to have set up a scientific research fleet of 15 ships. The fleet makes it possible to conduct research and monitor the ecology of the Caspian. A modern fish farm has been built in Azerbaijan in order to increase the amount of fish. At the same time, the activities of companies in the Caspian are under strict surveillance.

Asked about the influence of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline on the country's environment, Bagirov pointed out that the builders have taken into account all 14 requirements and proposals of the Ecology Ministry. The route of the oil pipeline was changed in order to preserve vegetation.


Russia: New Approach to Fighting Forest Fires
RIA Novosti, September 10, 2004
By RIA Novosti commentator Tatyana Sinitsina

Moscow -- September is the end of the fire season in Russia. This season was relatively quiet. About 20,000 fires, which covered over 400,000 hectares, were recorded in 2004. In comparison, over the last decade there were an average of 34,000 forest fires covering up to 2,000,000 hectares a year.

However, there is no precise statistical data on forest fires in Russia yet. "Fires are not recorded at all in a number of northern areas in Siberia and the Far East, as there is no appropriate infrastructure there," said Georgy Korovin, director of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Center for Environment and Forest Productivity and a member of the Academy of Natural Sciences. Forest fires could be recorded by satellites but there are discrepancies between data from satellites and information from the ground, he said.

Thankfully, this year's relatively light fire season was largely because of the rather cold and rainy summer. However, members of the fire protection service do not want the weather alone to determine the scale of forest fires but also their own efficient efforts. However, today their efforts cannot be qualified as such. Therefore, the Concept of Protecting Forests against Fires has been developed to improve their performance. According to Albert Kasparov, chief of the Federal Forestry Agency's preservation and protection department, the Natural Resources Ministry is expected to submit the document for the government's consideration in the near future.

The concept reflects the key areas of the Russian forest firefighting services' development and new approaches to extinguishing fires. "We have determined where fires should be extinguished and where they should not," said Mr. Kasparov. "Natural fire cycles have existed since creation. Fire is not always harmful for forests," said Mr. Korovin. "Fire burns away old grass and dead wood and thereby helps improve animal habitats because disease foci and infestants have been eliminated. Fires are extremely important for some ecosystems. Cones of some kinds of pine trees open only during a fire, for example."
Mr. Korovin said it was a mistake in the past to put out all fires without exception. Putting out uncontrollable fires is the most wasteful way of spending funds allocated for forest preservation purposes, said Mr. Korovin. It would be more appropriate to allocate money to improve fire warning systems, purchase new equipment, and update the aircraft fleets. The new concept gives Russian forest management organizations precisely this task.


Russian Prime Minister Opposes Kyoto Protocol - Newspaper
BBC Monitoring International Reports, September 12, 2004
Source: Vedomosti , Moscow, in Russian 9 Sep 04

Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov is reportedly against Russia's signing the Kyoto protocol, which he has called "ineffective, unfair, and disadvantageous" in a letter to Putin, a Russian newspaper has reported. Other government members, notably the Ministry of Industry and Energy and the Ministry for Economic Development and Trade, believe the Kyoto protocol is to Russia's advantage. The following is text of report by Russian newspaper Vedomosti on 9 September. Fradkov is not advising the president to ratify the Kyoto protocol.

Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov shared his doubts with the president regarding the expediency of ratifying the Kyoto protocol. In a letter to Vladimir Putin, he calls this initiative ineffective, unfair, and disadvantageous. However, in the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, they are expecting to "correct" the prime minister's position by the end of the year.

Without Russia's ratification, the Kyoto protocol cannot go into effect. Signed in December of 1997, the document presupposes a reduction in emission of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, fluorides, methane, nitrous oxide) in the world by 5.2 per cent for 2008-2012 - to the level of 1990. The countries which pollute the environment less than the established standards can sell their quotas for emission of excess gases to those which pollute the environment over the limits. In the past decade, Russian industry experienced a crisis, and emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere (80 per cent of all emissions of greenhouse gases) declined by more than 25 per cent. Therefore, officials had expected that, in case of ratification of the Kyoto protocol, the country would be able to earn money on the sale of quotas. Back in September of 2002, former Prime Minister Mikhail Kasyanov had promised the European Union, which initiated its signing, that the Kyoto protocol would be ratified. This spring, Putin also spoke out in favour of ratification, and the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAN) was assigned the task of appraising the attractiveness of this step for the Russian economy.

The academicians came to the conclusion that the protocol "has no scientific substantiation". Their report states that, "in the coldest country of the world", global warming - and the Kyoto agreement is intended to combat it - would make it possible, specifically, to reduce expenditures for heating, and even to increase the "biomass".

Now, the government is also speaking out against ratification of the Kyoto protocol. Vedomosti has in its possession a copy of the 23 August letter sent by Fradkov to Putin. In it, the prime minister writes that the document "has no scientific basis", and is ineffective, and also does not fully consider the natural-climatic conditions of countries that may be possible participants, which is "especially bad for Russia". Furthermore, from the prime minister's standpoint, the protocol is also unfair: it does nothing to regulate the level of emissions of gases in those countries which do not join this pact.

Appended to the letter are calculations, performed by two institutes of the RAN (Russian Academy of Sciences) and by the Institute for Economic Analysis (IEA) under the leadership of the president's adviser on economic questions Andrey Illarionov. From them, it follows that, with different scenarios of development of the economy, already by 2012 the level of emission of greenhouse gases in it will surpass the 1990 indicator. And that means Russia would have to buy, and not sell, quotas. The prime minister is promising to present more detailed conclusions to Putin by 1 January 2005.

The Ministry of Industry and Energy and the Ministry for Economic Development and Trade, however, do not share Fradkov's scepticism. Back in April, in their draft government report, officials insisted that "the Kyoto protocol does not bear any threat to the economic development" of Russia, and that, with the aid of commercial cession of its emission quotas, the country would be able to attract investments for reduction of the energy intensiveness of the economy. Ministry representative Viktor Khristenko told Vedomosti that the position of The Ministry of Industry and Energy "remains the same: we support the ratification of the Kyoto protocol". The Ministry of Industry and Energy plans to send a report, voicing its objections to the calculations of the academicians and the IEA, to the prime minister in September. And an associate of the Ministry for Economic Development and Trade says that (Minister) German Gref's subordinates intend to persuade Fradkov in the course of coordinating the December report for Putin. "We are proceeding from the fact that Russia needs additional investments (into ecologically clean types of production), and the argumentation presented in the letter (sent by Fradkov to Putin) is simply inconsistent," explained the public official. Yesterday, a three-hour meeting on ratification of the Kyoto protocol was held in the president's administration. According to two of the participants in this meeting, the Kremlin's reply to Fradkov's letter will be ready within the week.

"Naturally, we welcome the fact that we will be paid money for increasing effectiveness (of burning fuel) - that is, for what we are already doing," adviser to the chairman of the board of RAO YeES (Russian joint-stock company Unified Energy Systems) Anatoliy Zelinskiy explained the reasons for which his company supports the Kyoto protocol. But the top manager of a major metallurgical company says that, after talking with "potential investors", the enthusiasm of his holding company regarding the document has "waned". "It is unclear whether we should expect any serious investments." However, according to the calculations of the chairman of the board of the National Carbon Agreement (the main lobbyist for ratification of the protocol), Sergey Vasilyev, in order to exceed the limits of 1990 on emissions, Russia would have to "perform another industrialization".


Russia Starts Work on Lake Baykal Environment Programme
BBC Monitoring International Reports, September 7, 2004
Source: Interfax-AVN military news agency web site, Moscow, in English 1404 gmt 7 Sep 04Moscow -- Russian Emergencies Ministry experts have started working out a five-year programme of environmental security maintenance on Lake Baykal, Col Viktor Beltsov, deputy head of the ministry's PR department, said on Tuesday (7 September).

"The programme will be developed together with territorial executive bodies before 1 January 2005 and a conference on Baykal's environmental security will take place already in the first quarter of next year," Beltsov told the Interfax-Military News Agency.

Expeditions held by the Emergencies Ministry, the Oceanology Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Limnological Institute of the academy's Siberian branch over the past three years have found 472 dangerous objects on Baykal's lake, he said. "Examination of a total of 426 sq km of the Baykal water area, including the Maloye More Sea, Barguzin and Chivyrkui bays and Port Baykal, has revealed that submerged dangerous objects are mostly located at depths of less than 100 m.," Beltsov noted. Ninety-six objects have been examined by underwater robots, he went on. Water and soil probes taken in those areas showed that dangerous substances do not exceed admissible concentrations. Twenty submerged objects, namely 19 cars and a barge, have been lifted from the bottom and handed over for scrapping. A paddle-boat and a metal pontoon have been removed from the fairway. "Other objects will be examined during future expeditions. Data on them will be added to a registration book, which the Emergencies Ministry will have to maintain under a resolution of the Russian government," Beltsov said.


Illarionov Attacks Britain, Vows to Bury Kyoto
Moscow Times, July 12, 2004
By Simon Ostrovsky

President Vladimir Putin's personal adviser on all things economic last week accused British Prime Minister Tony Blair's government of declaring "all-out and total war on Russia" and using "bribes, blackmail and murder threats" to force it to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. In a six-hour diatribe, Andrei Illarionov accused visiting Blair adviser Sir David King, the British government's top scientist, of trying, through pressure from Blair's office and through Foreign Secretary Jack Straw personally, to hijack a two-day conference on the global environmental treaty at the Russian Academy of Sciences.

"During the past year the British have used bribes, blackmail and murder threats to put pressure on Russia, which shows how desperate their case is," Illarionov said without elaborating. "This has not been in the realm of the press, but it had to come out after Sir David King's behavior at the conference," he said.King filibustered the conference for four hours in an effort to block opponents of the protocol from presenting their findings, Illarionov said.

Illarionov, an outspoken and respected liberal economist, has often clashed with government officials on a variety of reform issues -- including the Kyoto Protocol, which will die if Russia does not ratify it. It is not clear how much sway Illarionov has with Putin, a fellow St. Petersburger.

Putin appeared to back the protocol earlier this year in exchange for the European Union supporting Russia's bid to join the World Trade Organization. But late Thursday, when asked by a Japanese journalist whether his fierce opposition to Kyoto reflected the Kremlin's position, Illarionov said Putin had never said he backs the treaty. "Putin didn't say he supports the Kyoto Protocol, he said he supports the Kyoto process," Illarionov said. He did not elaborate.

After signing a trade deal with the EU in May, Putin said Brussels had met Russia "halfway" on WTO, which "cannot but affect positively our position on the Kyoto Protocol." But he also stressed that Russia "did not package the issues of WTO and the Kyoto Protocol." "I cannot say how things will be 100 percent, because ratification is not an issue for the president but for parliament," Putin said at the time. Illarionov accused Britain and other "imperialist" rich nations of using Kyoto to keep poor nations from developing. The United States backed out of Kyoto in 2001. Britain denied the charge. "Global warming is an issue of concern for all citizens of the world and we need to tackle it," British Embassy spokesman Richard Turner said.

Peter Cox, head of the British Meteorological Office's climate, chemistry and ecosystems department, said last week's conference was a publicity stunt by Illarionov, who brought in well-known skeptics to discredit the findings of the International Panel on Climate Control, the basis for Kyoto, Cox said.

"The meeting was set up to challenge the IPCC line," he said. "Illarionov hijacked the meeting by inviting people who were outside the IPCC process and who were bitter about that." Cox said the conference was "like no other" he had ever attended and said he felt very sorry for the Russian scientists that were used as a "rubber stamp for Illarionov's agenda." The academy issued a statement after the conference saying that it found "no scientific basis" for the Kyoto Protocol, and that a warmer Earth is actually positive for Russia.

The stated aim of the 1997 protocol is to roll back global carbon dioxide emissions -- which many scientists say cause global warming -- to 1990 levels. Many poor countries have argued that the agreement puts a disproportionate amount of pressure on their carbon dioxide-intensive, manufacturing-based economies. Illarionov, however, has also opted to attack the very scientific principles on which IPCC bases its argument for implementing the treaty.

Illarionov argued that the real reason every rich nation but America, the world's biggest polluter, backs the protocol is because they want control of emissions quotas, something he said will give developed nations unprecedented control of poor countries' economies.

"Europe has seen the effects of the national-socialist ideology and the Marxist ideology. The imperialist philosophy behind Kyoto is nothing short of these in its scale," he said. "This is war. But our cause is just and we will prevail."


Academician Izrael: Kyoto Protocol Economically Hazardous to Russia
RIA Novosti, July 17, 2004

Moscow -- The Kyoto Protocol is scientifically ungrounded and economically hazardous to Russia, well-known Russian scholar Academician Yuri Izrael opines in the Nezavisimaya Gazeta. He heads the Global Climate and Ecology Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and conducts the academic seminar Ways to Prevent Climatic Changes and Possible Negative Effects; Problems of the Kyoto Protocol.

Many take the Kyoto Protocol for granted, he writes. However, many climatologists and economists doubt its scientific reasons. After the international climatic conference, which was held on President Vladimir Putin's initiative in Moscow last autumn and gathered over 2,000 specialists, this issue has assumed a greater edge, the Russian academician notes.

Taking the floor, Russian President Vladimir Putin said we would tackle the problem of possible joining the Kyoto Protocol and its ratification but only with reliance on Russia's national interest. The president has instructed a number of ministries and the national Academy of Sciences to inquire into the matter. Since last January, a special council has been at work - the Academy's seminar made up of 26 prominent scientists and specialists from the Academy. Over six months, the council held 12 sessions and heard over 20 scientific reports. On May 14, the seminar drew the following conclusion: First, the Kyoto Protocol is scientifically ungrounded and does not indicate the road towards the end set. The economically inefficient protocol leads to only an insignificant cutting of the hothouse emissions. Currently, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air is 370 millionths. In the next ten years, it will increase by 20 millionths. Observance of the Kyoto Protocol will contain the increase by only one or two millionth in ten years. Swedish Professor, Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Bert Bolin has already expressed similar opinion in Kyoto. Therefore, it is our opinion that the Kyoto Protocol is inefficient.

Second, the economic aspect of the Kyoto Protocol holds no water. We are told: the 1990s economic decline forced Russia to axe hothouse emissions and now it has a reserve. Sell it, earn money until you reach the 1990 level. They promise us to gain $30-40 billion. But, this "reserve" is rapidly dwindling because the Russian industrial growth is underway. Certain calculations show that the 1990 level will be reached in five to six years. Even if Russia sells quotas, it can earn from them about 200 million euros, as estimated by specialists from the European Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences. Reaching the 1990 level, Russia will have to pay from $160-600 for preventing the emission of one metric ton of carbon dioxide. Today Russia will sell the quotas on carbon dioxide for only $4-5.

The recent seminar, held by the Russian Academy of Sciences with the involvement of foreign specialists, was very useful. It's worth noting that foreign scientists share Russia's doubts, concerning the efficiency of the Kyoto Protocol.

Its realisation contains another vague element. If a country of the European Union produces several extra metric tons of carbon dioxide exceeding the 1990 level, it is to downsize it either by a new technology or buying a quota from somebody. Quotas can be bought from countries, which do not produce the quantity fixed by the protocol. It is nonsense from the point of view of the idea of the protocol: emissions are not cut and, hence, there is no climatic gain.

Incidentally, two crucial questions remain unsolved. Firstly, how grave the harm would be from possible climatic changes. Very much depends on it for taking collective steps. Prevention of climatic changes can be too costly - trillions, dozens of trillions of dollars. Still, it has not yet been determined what harm we expect. It may be less what the Kyoto Protocol intends. Secondly, a limit for global warming which would not affect the climatic system has not yet been set. Without answering these two questions it is hard to talk of the value of the Kyoto Protocol for mankind.

Finally, in his recent article (Nezavisimaya Gazeta of July 8, 2004) David King, chief scientific counsellor for the British government, wrote that Academician Yuri Izrael notes the negative role for the Kyoto Protocol ratification of the G-7 plus China group of countries. "I have not said that," Academician Izrael stresses, "but believe that it would be easier to combat the negative effects of climatic modification by all the possible efforts of various countries."


Soviet-Contaminated Soil to Be Cleansed for Many Years
Czech News Agency (CTK), July 16, 2004

The Soviet army left Czechoslovakia in 1991, but it will last another eight years till the Czech Republic gets rid of hundreds of tonnes of various solvents and oil products it left here, the daily Mlada fronta Dnes writes today.

The products leaked into the ground from the tanks of Soviet troops or were simply poured out by them, according to the Environment Ministry. Thousands of hectares of the contaminated soil are still to be cleansed. "The pollution will plague us till 2012," Jaroslav Zima, the director of the environmental damage of the Environment Ministry, told the paper. If the contaminated area is not cleansed, it will be a dead area for both businessmen and tourists, Zima said.

The Soviet army used 73 areas of land of diverse acreage in the Czech Republic. However, the Ralsko area in North Bohemia and the Milovice training ground and barracks in Central Bohemia are among the worst hit.

The area of the former airfield Hradcany in Ralsko contains a tremendous quantity of kerosene, petrol, oil and lubricants in ground-water, Zima said."There is not only an oil film on the surface of the ground- water, but also a thick layer of oil substances," Zima said.

Last year alone, 415 tonnes of remnants of fuel and 374 tonnes of solvents were extracted from the underground in Hradcany and Milovice, Zima said. "When we started the work, we were staggered by a several- metre layer of oil substances in some places under the ground," former environment minister Bedrich Moldan said. Since 1992, the government has invested over one billion crowns to do away with the damage caused by the Soviet army.

It wants to spend another 250 million till 2012, Zima said, adding that the cleaning operation could proceed at a faster pace if more money were available. EU funds, the Czech Republic has asked for, could improve the situation, Zima said. Bomb disposal experts, too, have been very busy in Ralsko. In a single probe on just under 200 hectares of land they found 12,837 pieces of ammunition. It was a mere five percent of the land which has to be cleared of strewn hand grenades and land mines. Last year alone, the government paid 47 million crowns for the disposal.

Vojtech Kotecky from the Rainbow environmental group points to the time bomb ticking in the underground drinking water reservoir in Ralsko. "It was contaminated by lye from uranium extraction destined for the Soviet Union," Kotecky said.

"The bill will be pretty hefty. By 2030, when the decontamination is to be finished, we will have to pay 50 billion," he added.


Russians Adopt European Buffaloes in Conservation Program
Agence France Presse, July 13, 2004
By Viktoria Loginova

In a cash-strapped reserve not far from Moscow, European buffaloes roam in wait for rich Russian families willing to shoulder their feeding and veterinary costs.

In mid-June, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) called on Russians to donate towards the upkeep of European buffaloes in the Prioksko-Terrasny reserve, in a bid to protect this rare species, descendants of mammoths.

"Since the Soviet Union's fall, we have lacked financing. The state grants the reserve an annual 138,000 dollars, but this is just enough to pay the salaries and utility bills," the reserve's director Mikhail Brynskikh said. For a 1,500-dollar fee, one can earn the title of a baby buffalo's adopted parent and the right to give it a name and come visit at whim.

"Our project appeals to both private citizens and companies which may wish to adopt a buffalo while balancing their annual checkbooks," a WWF official in Moscow, Sergei Burmistrov, explained.

The first volunteers were a pair of lawyers, Vitaly Chubia and his wife Elena Kolomenskaya, who dubbed their month-old charge Murzilka, in honor of a time-honored children's magazine. "Our family and friends were shocked by our decision, they thought the sum was too much. But we did not hesitate a single minute," Kolomenskaya recalled.

"I was born in this region, near the preserve, and I am happy to be able to help its inhabitants," she added, watching from behind a fence as little Murzilka and his kin took a nonchalant walk in the forest. With their large feet and short coats of soft beige, baby buffaloes look much more like small dogs than the future kings of the forest, resplendent with majesty and power. An adult animal is nearly two meters high and three meters long, weighing up to 1,2 tonnes.

Centuries of merciless hunting brought the European buffalo, or bison bonasus, which once filled European forests, to the brink of extinction, with only 48 European buffaloes remaining in the world by the 1920s.

The Danki reserve was founded in 1948, with two buffalo couples brought over from neighboring Poland. "We bring buffaloes up to return them back to nature. Nearly 500 animals were brought up here since 1948," the reserve's guide Tatyana Brynskikh said proudly. Some 30 buffaloes are currently being raised on a 200-hectare plot of forest surrounded by a metal fence, with eight newborns now waiting for new Russian sponsorship.

Russia is now home to over 300 European buffaloes, with some 60 living in reserves -- in Danki or another near Ryazan southeast of Moscow.

The world's European buffalo population today stands at up to 3,000 animals, most of them living in Poland and Belarus.


Uzbek Experts Review Aral Sea Salvation Progress
BBC Monitoring International Reports, July 12, 2004

A round-table meeting, "Aral Sea problems: solutions and prospects", took place in Tashkent today. It was attended by environmentalists, water experts, staff from the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea and journalists who had visited the sea to learn about the latest situation there.

The project leader at the GEF (Global Environmental Facility) project for the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea, Rim Giniatullin, made a speech about the efforts being made to create artificial lakes, forests and saxaul (haloxylon) areas and encourage small-sized business and private enterprise under international and local projects.

Small loans worth 2bn soms (just over 2m dollars) have been spent on developing small-sized business and private enterprise, creating 4,576 jobs. Meat, milk, egg, goods and confectionery production and services have been developing.

At the event, the journalists who had toured the Aral Sea to learn about the environment and people's social conditions in the area, pointed out that the efforts to improve the situation there were producing good results. They also said that flora and fauna were being restored in the artificial lakes, forests and saxaul areas being created.


Bumps along Russia's Open Road
The International Herald Tribune, July 12, 2004
By James Brooke

Khabarovsk -- It could be this summer's ultimate road trip: driving from the Baltic to the Pacific. Just before Russia's elections last March, President Vladimir Putin inaugurated a 2,150-kilometer link in a trans-Russia highway that starts in St. Petersburg, on the Gulf of Finland, and ends 10,560 kilometers later in Vladivostok, on the Sea of Japan.

"Russia built the Trans-Siberian Railway in 1903 and now, some 100 years later, this highway was built," he said, standing in the snows of Khabarovsk, the eastern end of the once missing link across eastern Siberia.

Running over permafrost and through virgin taiga forest, the new federal road is almost three times as long as the fabled Route 66 in the United States, and it dethrones the 7,780-kilometer, or 4,860-mile, Trans-Canada Highway, which for decades was the world's longest national highway.

But before various motor-heads grab their international driver's licenses and start planning the drive, they should remember that Putin inaugurated the road when it was nicely concealed beneath packed snow. "In some sections there is no road, just a roadbed graded by bulldozers, with trees knocked down everywhere," Gennadi Kulaev, a 42-year-old businessman, said by telephone. "You can hardly get through." In mid-March, he said, he wrestled a Toyota Land Cruiser from Vladivostok to his home in Ulan-Ude, east of Lake Baikal in Siberia, a trip of about 3,440 kilometers. Referring to one segment, he said: "There is 700 kilometers of no road. There is no other word to call it -- goat tracks.

"At some places, it was blocked by rocks from the mountains detonated by dynamite. So drivers had to hire bulldozers working nearby, or just crawl atop those rock piles as I did."

At the inauguration ceremony, one highway official assured the president that he had driven the new section at an average speed of 85 kilometers an hour. Later, highway officials admitted that only a quarter of the new section, called the Amur Link, is paved, and that it will take five years to finish it. "There are paved sections, sometimes near settlements, sometimes just a piece of asphalt in the middle of nowhere," Kulaev said.

Like the Trans-Canada Highway and the Trans-Amazonica in Brazil, Russia's cross-continental road is a nation-building exercise. The road's Asia section, which spans seven time zones, is designed to plant Russia's flag more firmly along its long border with China. Siberia makes up three-quarters of Russia's territory, but has only a fifth of its paved roads.

After the inauguration of the link, which has more than 250 bridges, the first truck convoy drove west from Khabarovsk bearing signs reading "There is a road, there is life, there is Russia." Construction on the highway, planned in 1966, began in 1978, at the rate of only three kilometers a month. A few years ago, Putin latched on to the struggling project. Last year, a quarter of all of the national government's road-building money went into the trans-Russia highway. It has been financed partly by a large low-interest loan from the European Union.

Already, the road is getting baleful glares from some Russians who believe that the only way to traverse steppe and taiga is on the Trans-Siberian Railroad. Vladimir Krapivnyi, chief railroad engineer for Russia's Far East, said: "If I need to drive more than five hours, I prefer the train. It's faster, cheaper and safer."

Noting that the Trans-Siberian can cross Russia at 150 kilometers an hour, moving day and night, he said the trip from Vladivostok to Moscow took about a week. He added with disdain, "By car it will take 25 days." And don't expect to find gas stations, restaurants and roadside motels in Siberia. Drivers pack food and gasoline, and keep their tire irons handy for unwanted night visitors.

Between the Siberian cities, "there is nothing, just nothing," said Alex Petrollini, a Canadian who manages a motel on the road leading north from Vladivostok. But even with the potholes, tree stumps and layers of mud atop permafrost, local officials along the route consider the road the end of the railroad's century-long monopoly.

"Along the road, new villages, small towns will emerge to exploit the road, to repair the road, to sell goods, to offer hotels, and so on," said Vladimir Kuchuk, international adviser to the Khabarovsk government.

To promote the road, a Vladivostok travel agency, Terra Tour, and a local car dealership, Japancar.ru, dropped the checkered flag on May 15 on 19 cars participating in a 19,870-kilometer rally from Vladivostok to Moscow and back. Competing for a purse of more than $17,000, 13 drivers completed the trip on June 13.

By the end of this decade, it is projected that there will be eight cars for every 10 Russian families; about half of all Russian families have cars now, the government says. Residents of the Russian Far East sense that soon they will feel the call of the open highway.

"You can't just put a label on it, and call it a road," said Sergei Rudenko, a Khabarovsk taxi driver. "But they promise to pave it by 2008. Then I will go to Baikal for a summer vacation. Two thousand kilometers should be nothing."


Forest Fire Situation to Remain Tense in Russia Next Week
ITAR-TASS News Agency, July 10, 2004

Forest fire areas will expand in some Russian regions next week, the Russian Emergencies Ministry's Antidisaster Centre forecasts.The situation will remain tense in the Far East where fires are raging in Yakutia, the Magadan Region and the Khabarovsk Territory, the ministry's press service reported.

The number of outbreaks may increase in the Chita and Irkutsk regions and Buryatia.The blaze areas will enlarge in the Kurgan, Sverdlovsk, Tyumen and Chelyabinsk regions. Large outbreaks are possible in Komi and the Arkhangelsk Region, a ministerial spokesman said.

Small forest fires may also take place in the Central Federal District. According to the ministry's information, there are 188 forest fires in Russia now over a total area of almost 11,000 hectares.

More than 16,000 forest fire outbreaks have been reported since the beginning of this year. As compared to last year, the number of fires is almost the same, but the total area is eight times less.


Putin's Adviser Slams British Pressure over Kyoto Protocol
BBC Monitoring International Reports, July 8, 2004

Moscow -- The Russian president's economic adviser, Andrey Illarionov, believes that the British cabinet is putting unprecedented pressure on Russia in terms of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. This is how Illarionov has qualified the scandal which yesterday broke out at a seminar on climate change at the Russian Academy of Sciences, to which leading foreign academics were invited.

Illarionov said that the chief scientific adviser of British Prime Minister Tony Blair and of the British cabinet, Sir David King, made a demand resembling an ultimatum that the president of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yuriy Osipov, review the seminar's agenda to cross off from the list of reports over half the foreign participants. King said he would leave the seminar unless his demands were met.

"King attempted to put pressure on the organizers of the seminar through British Foreign Minister Jack Straw and through the office of the British prime minister," Illarionov said. He added that "he has not encountered such undisguised pressure before".

"If I had been told about such behaviour by foreign representatives in Russia four years ago, I would have dismissed this as Communist propaganda," Illarionov said. He qualified the incident as "an undeclared war on Russia" and the Kyoto Protocol "as the biggest international adventure resting on anti-human, totalitarian ideology".


Russian Premier Wants Auctions to Give Access to Natural Resources
BBC Monitoring International Reports, July 8, 2004

Moscow -- A mechanism of auctions is needed in providing access to natural resources, Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov said, outlining the major directions of the work of the Cabinet of Ministers at a government session today.

"The use of natural resources should be optimized. The introduction of a mechanism of auctions would give access to the field development only to conscientious users," Fradkov said. He also proposed expanding the system of environmental payments and introducing a mechanism of environmental insurance.

The prime minister also asked the minister of natural resources to draw up a list of federal reserves needed to secure Russia's strategic interests in case it runs out of other sources of raw materials.


Russia, China Monitor Water Quality of Border Rivers
BBC Monitoring International Reports, July 6, 2004
Source: Channel One TV, Moscow, in Russian 0300 gmt 6 Jul 04

(Presenter) Russian and Chinese ecologists have started a unique project. They are checking the quality of water in the border rivers. Experts say that the results of the probe will help draw up a set of measures to save the River Amur and its tributaries from an environmental catastrophe. Vladimir Voropayev reports.

(Correspondent) The research Gidrokhimik (Hydrochemist) cutter is operating on the River Ussuri. The vessel slows down at the places where the devices register alarming incidents. It often stops. For example, the contents of oxygen in the water are reaching zero nearly everywhere. This means that abnormal chemical processes are going in the river.

The time has past when scientists simply took samples of water with the help of glass or plastic bottles and then carried out tests in laboratories. All the necessary equipment to carry out express analyses is now right on board the vessel. For many years the PRC categorically refused to give necessary information and, moreover, to carry out joint tests. The dialogue between the border areas was reduced to mutual recriminations about the contamination of the rivers. The situation has changed now. An accord on a coordinated nature-protection policy has been reached. The international environmental monitoring is the first step. Russian and Chinese researchers are using a single method.

(Viktor Saykov, coordinator of the Russian-Chinese ecological monitoring group) There is no special variant reading or conflicting figures between the experts. There are admissible, quite real errors which are understandable. There are already no substantial differences.

(Correspondent) The scientists' conclusions will form the basis of inter-state decisions. Russia and China will have to work out joint measures to save the border rivers from ecological catastrophe.


Russia Baikal Lake may be entered into UNESCO Red Book
ITAR-TASS News Agency, July 5, 2004
By Andrei Kirillov

The possibility of entering Russia's Baikal Lake into the UNESCO Red Book of endangered nature objects of world importance was discussed at the 28th session of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, currently in progress in China.

However, the coordinator of the Russian Greenpeace, Ivan Blokov, said that the organization did not insist on adding the Baikal Lake to the Red Book.

According to him, ecologists just want "to send a signal" to oil-and-gas enterprises as well as paper mills, operating near that unique lake.

These plants must not cause any direct or indirect damage to the objects on the World Heritage. List, he added.


Siberian Forests on Fire Alert as Temperatures Set to Soar
BBC Monitoring International Reports, May 13, 2004

Novosibirsk -- Emergency regulations have been introduced in the forests of Altay Territory. RIA-Novosti news agency was told by the press service of the territory's administration today that the head of the region, Mikhail Yevdokimov, had made this decision because of the onset of dry and hot weather.

Weather forecasters are saying temperatures will rise to 38 degrees in the next few days and the fire service ranks this at the highest level (category 4-5) of fire danger.

Under the emergency, residents' access to forests is restricted and the services of the main territorial civil defence and emergencies directorates are on alert. Instructions have been issued to the leaders of towns and districts to pay particular attention to fire safety measures in the forests.

The administration's press service also said there have been over 160 fires this season in the region, affecting a total of more than 380 ha of forest.

(Almost 50,000 ha of forests have been damaged by fire this year in Russia, according to ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow, in Russian 0738 gmt 13 May.)


Emergency Situation Declared in Forests of Altai, Sverdlov Region
ITAR-TASS News Agency, May 13, 2004

Barnaul -- An emergency situation is declared in the forests of the Altai territory on Thursday. Governor Mikhail Yevdokimov made the decision over dry and hot weather in the territory.

Weathermen forecast the temperature rise up to 35-38 Celsius degrees above zero that sharply increases the fire hazard. In this connection the access of people in the forest is restricted, services of the main territorial department for civil defense and emergency situations are put on alert.

More than 160 fires on the area of 400 hectares are registered in the forests of the Altai territory since the beginning of the summer season. Meanwhile an emergency situation is also declared in the forests of the Sverdlov region over the high fire hazard. The access of people in the forest is drastically limited, a source in the Volga-Ural regional centre of the Russian Emergencies Ministry told on Thursday.

More than 500 fires on the area of 3.3 thousand hectares are registered in the Volga-Ural region for the past day alone. As many as 3,000 rescuers and fire-fighters that are equipped with hundreds of pieces of special machinery put out fires on the half of the area engulfed by the flames.

An emergency situation is also declared in the forests of the Chelyabinsk region over the fire hazard. An extremely dangerous situation emerged over dry and hot weather in the South Urals. More than 3,000 hectares of forests have been liquidated near the city of Plavsk for several days. Pine woods are ablaze in the highlands near Kasli and Verkhniy Ufalei. The relict pine wood is burning in Chelyabinsk. Emergency teams, residents, cadets of military institutes are involved in the fire-fighting efforts.

The main cause of about 2,000 fires is careless attitude of peasants when setting afire straw and stubble on the fields. Holidaymakers who were picnicking in the forest during the May holidays are also to blame. The access of people in the forest is strictly limited on Thursday, fires on the fields are banned.


Forests Get a New Old Boss
The Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press, April 28, 2004
By Yury Alekseyev. Nezavisimaya gazeta, March 30, 2004, p. 3.

Russian officials spent yesterday "under the forest canopy." In the Duma, deputies actively discussed the draft Forestry Code, while Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov, after a lengthy pause, finally named the person who will head the Federal Forestry Agency. . . . The forestry sector will be supervised by Valery Roshchupkin, a former deputy to Minister of Natural Resources Vitaly Artyukhov and hitherto director of the State Forestry Service.

In his new capacity, Roshchupkin will have to move quickly to address the problems of our forests. There are quite a few complaints about the Forestry Code (which is due to be sent to the Duma very soon) even within the Natural Resources Ministry itself, which has overall responsibility for our forests. As Deputy Minister of Natural Resources Yury Shuvayev put it in the Duma yesterday, the draft code "does not regulate matters of forest ownership with sufficient clarity." Specifically, it fails to establish procedures and criteria for dividing ownership of forests among the federal government, the members of the Russian Federation and municipal entities. Furthermore, the document establishes the right to transfer forest tracts to the ownership of a lessee after a 15-year period, but the proposed buyout price for a tract, set at 10 times the leasing cost, is at least 50% lower than it should be.

The deputy minister said that the draft code does not define any criteria for setting economically sound minimum leasing bids, and thus fails to give auction organizers any incentive to increase the fees charged for forest-use rights through the bidding process. .

The Greens have had much harsher criticism for the draft Forestry Code. Aleksei Yaroshenko, the coordinator of the Russian Greenpeace organization's forestry program, told NG that "the new draft Forestry Code creates serious problems for the operation of the legal timber business. And at the same time, it opens up a multitude of loopholes that would make things substantially easier for illegal and quasi-legal timber cutters. For example, the code would totally dismantle the permit system for leases for a term of less than one year -- and there are plenty of other examples. So it would definitely open the door to predatory and poorly regulated exploitation of our forests. Virtually all forestry specialists agree that the code cannot be adopted in this form; considerably more time will be needed to rework it, and its drafters have to be willing to pay attention to criticism. This view is shared not only by environmental organizations, but also by many timber industry executives, forestry inspectors, specialists working for regional administrations, scientists and many others," Yaroshenko added.

Russian Greenpeace has some hope that the situation will improve now that Valery Roshchupkin is in charge of managing the nation's forests.


Federal Changes Will Put Out a Few Fires
Moscow Times, April 15, 2004
By Valeria Korchagina

The peat bog fires that cloaked Moscow in a choking gray haze for much of the summer of 2002 could have been put out more quickly had it not been for one obstacle: bureaucracy. When the issue of the fires was raised at a Cabinet meeting that summer, it quickly became clear that there was no single state agency dedicated to fighting them. Fires in Moscow region forests were the responsibility of the Natural Resources Ministry. When they moved onto agricultural land, they became an issue for the Agriculture Ministry. The Emergency Situations Ministry, meanwhile, was standing by until they neared towns and cities.

"There was immediately the question: Who is responsible? The answer was nobody!" recalled Andrei Sharov, head of the Economic Development and Trade Ministry's state service department.

As bureaucrats struggled, they learned that there was a little-known federal agency called the State Turf Inspectorate that in theory should be overseeing peat bog blazes, Sharov said. But its powers were so unclear that its staff could not do anything to help combat the fires.

As such, it proved impossible to organize an operation to fight the fires -- and they continued to pump smoke into Moscow's air until winter finally set in.

The top-to-bottom overhaul of the federal government should prevent such a bureaucratic deadlock from happening again, said Sharov, who with his staff drafted the reform. The aim of the revamp, which kicked off in March, is to cut red tape and improve efficiency by trimming staff, raising salaries and clearly spelling out responsibilities.

The State Turf Inspectorate has already been disbanded, and the Emergency Situations Ministry has been given sole responsibility for fighting fires, no matter where they break out.

While there have been no peat bog fires in the past 1 1/2 months to test the effectiveness of the new government structure, perhaps the most noticeable change it has brought so far is that for the first time in contemporary Russian history the Cabinet members actually fit around one table and the average meeting lasts from 60 minutes to 90 minutes, compared to four hours in the previous government.

Critics of the reform say there may not be many more changes. They point out, among other things, that despite plans to lay off civil servants, the reform has already boosted the total number of state bodies from 60 to 76.

Sharov acknowledged that obstacles remain, but expressed hope that they would be largely overcome by the time the new system is supposed to be up and running in 2006. By then, the overhaul should include regional and municipal administrations.

Federal bureaucrats in Moscow are already being laid off, with the goal to cut their ranks from 25,000 to some 18,000, Sharov said. Another 300,000 people will be sent into the private sector from dozens of state-funded laboratories, testing centers and other organizations that are at the government's disposal. Once cut off from federal funding, those people would be able to bid for government contracts for anything from alcohol quality control and checking cars for technical compliance to analyzing industrial emissions.

"There will be orders from state officials for such expertise, and the state will just be buying their services on the market," Sharov said in a recent interview in his modest office overlooking the statue of Mayakovsky on Triumfalnaya Ploshchad.

Asked whether that might breed corruption, he replied, "No, because if anyone decided to cheat, their competitors would be more than happy to tip off the authorities." As for retaining qualified staff, the answer lies in raising salaries and changing spending priorities, Sharov said.

"It is, after all, unclear why our traffic policemen drive in police Mercedes while their salaries are $ 200 a month, or why all of us have Pentium-4 computers when in most cases an electronic typewriter will do," he said.

In addition, the government spends billions of rubles a year maintaining an independent system of healthcare for its staff that includes hospitals, clinics and other facilities. "Why not just get rid of it all and buy medical insurance for everyone?" Sharov said.

It also would be cheaper to provide cheap mortgages for civil servants instead of building new housing for them, he said. Sharov said that even though the number of state bodies has grown to 76, in reality the efficiency of the government will improve.

"If we were to simply break the functions into three types -- strategy, asset management and control -- we would have ended up with something like 177 state bodies. But this is not the case," he said.

While on the federal level the plan on how to build a leaner governing machine is more or less clear, regional authorities could deliver some surprises by taking up some of the thousands of functions that the federal government is discarding -- be it in licensing, regulation or something else, according to Sharov.

Should this problem arise in the regions, there are always prosecutors to step in and straighten things out, Sharov said. Putin's administration went through a similar situation from 2000 to 2004, when it launched a campaign to ensure that regional laws conform with federal ones, and the lessons it learned then could be used in pushing through administrative reform, Sharov said.


Missing the Woods for the Trees
Financial Times, April 13, 2004
By Arkady Ostrovsky

The prophetic words of Doctor Astrov, spoken more than a century ago in Chekhov's play still ring true across much of Russia's richly forested land.

The north-west region of Karelia that borders Finland is a prime source of Russian timber and a sad example of the poor management of the country's natural wealth. Its forests are disappearing with little benefits for local villages which suffer from power shortages, alcoholism and unemployment.

The poverty is all the more striking in comparison with Finland, which turned the same forests into an important source of national wealth.

Russia is blessed with 25 per cent of all the world's forests. But this wealth is simply being squandered, causing damage both to the environment and the economy. "Russia gets the minimum economic value out of its forests and causes maximum damage to its environment," says Alexey Yaroshenko, forest programme coordinator Greenpeace in Russia. Greenpeace estimates that over the past 50 years, 80 per cent of the accessible forests in Karelia have disappeared. Only half of them have been replanted. Given that it takes more than 100 years for a forest to grow, Karelia - and Russia as a whole - will soon have a shortage of commercially accessible forest.

Mr Yaroshenko says Russia treats its forests not as a renewable natural resource but as an oil well that dries up once all the oil has been extracted. "The attitude to forests is the same: you take what is there and move on." The question of forestry has been hotly debated in Russia since last year, when the government submitted to parliament a new law that would allow the privatisation of the forests. Under the proposed legislation, forests could be privatised after they have been rented out for 15 years. The newly-appointed minister for natural resources has yet to state his position on forests.

But Greenpeace, the logging businesses and scientists are all worried about the consequences of the proposed legislation. This gives little clue about the government's future plans for leskhozy - local state organisations which traditionally have controlled logging activities. It would also permit cutting trees and building houses in greenbelt forests where such activities were previously banned.

In Karelia's case, this could further endanger virgin forests along the 600km long Russian-Finnish border. Thanks to the Soviet-era paranoia, and the barbed wire that separated Russia from Finland during the Cold War, many of these forests were left untouched.

"These are unique primary forests with trees which are over 300 year old which had never been touched by humans and retain their original biological systems," says Yevgeny Ieshko of the Academy of Sciences in Karelia. "There are very few forests like this left in Europe."

Academics and non-governmental organisations such as Greenpeace have over the past few years managed to save some of the forests which now will become a nature reserve.

Yet the main problem is not so much that Russia cuts down its trees - there are few countries that do not - but what it does to them afterwards.

Yuri Kovalevsky, chief forester in the Kostamuksha nature reserve, says his heart bleeds when he sees trucks loaded with unprocessed trees heading for the Finnish border, only 20 miles away, only for Russians to then buy their furniture in Finland. "It does not make sense: we sell raw materials and then go to buy furniture there. If only we used our resources more rationally." Forcing his four-wheel drive through a snowy 1\landscape that looks like a chess-board with patches of cut forest, Nikolai Salakka, a forester-turned-businessman, says:

"Many companies fell trees for the sake of felling. Everywhere you go, you see abandoned felled trees that had been left to rot. Many companies fell more trees than they can take out of the forest, but they cut them anyway."

Mr Yaroshenko of Greenpeace estimates that some 20-25 per cent of all timber is wasted. He argues that existing legislation encourages companies to cut more trees than they can sell. If a company does not cut all the trees from the patch it had been allocated, it gets fined.

Another problem is that young forests are left without tending. This increases the time it takes for them to grow into commercially valuable forests.

This helps to explain why more than half of all logging in Russia is carried out in virgin forests. Environmentalists and logging experts say that in contrast, almost all Finnish and Swedish timber is produced from trees that have been replanted. Poor management also deprives the local economy of new employment opportunities. "You don't need many people to cut the trees, but you need people to replant them and to take care of them," Mr Yaroshenko says.


Siberians Want to Clean Up
Liverpool Daily Echo, April 7, 2004
By Liam Murphy

A Siberian city overshadowed by industry and pollution is hoping to renew its links with the leafy suburbs of Wirral in a bid to clean up its environment.

Three years ago a twinning programme based on an air pollution initiative joined the unlikely partners of Wirral and Tomsk in Siberia.

But as the programme draws to a conclusion the Siberian city has asked Wirral to help them keep the partnership alive.

In 2001 council chiefs from Wirral visited Tomsk to see how they approach environmental work, meeting with local scientists and politicians,as well as businesses.

An intensive 12 week training programme was also developed for representatives from the former Soviet city, introducing them to the council's pollution control section,and UK practice in monitoring air quality,as well as showing how the local authority works with industry in the area.

It is now hoped Wirral will act as the UK civic figurehead,although most of the cost for the project,around pounds 134,000, will come from the European Union, which supports partnerships between European regions and New Independent States,formerly part of the USSR.

The project has been made possible through the TACIS (TechnicalAssistance for Economic Reform in the Members of the Commonwealth of Independent States) City Twinning programme which is a European funded body which encourages states of western Europe to work with the former Soviet Union to help development.

Alan Brown, assistant director in Wirral Council's planning and economic development department, said the success of the project had prompted Tomsk city Administration to push for the scheme to continue.

He said Tomsk, which is a heavily industrialised area with significant pollution problems, had been able to learn how the council can work with industry to manage the environment and deal with pollution.

He said: "Not only was it a very appropriate project, but friendships were secured between the two areas.

"Our colleagues in Tomsk got a great deal out of the project in terms of air quality management, and about how we in Wirral try to manage and take responsibility for air quality control.

"Wirral has been involved in a trail blazing project in terms of the Siberian system, and it's good for the prestige of Wirral and Merseyside."


Hope for Russian Forests as Privatization Drive Is Barred
Deutsche Presse-Agentur, April 5, 2004

Russia's forests, which hold a quarter of the world's timber, won a reprieve Monday as regional leaders opposed government privatization plans that could see woodland stripped bare by unscrupulous new owners.

"The possibility of Russian forests going private will trigger a tide of angry protests from millions of citizens," said Sergei Mironov, speaker of the federation council of governors, the upper chamber of parliament that must approve new forest management laws drafted by the cabinet.

While not ruling out private ownership in future, Mironov said current irrational management of forest resources by tenants did not support the plans to privatize much of Russia's approximate 6,000 square kilometres of woodland. Russia is the world's second largest exporter of round timber and earns five billion U.S. dollars a year.

Meanwhile, Finland, with a territory around the same size as the Russian republic of Karelia, earns over 11 billion dollars, the Itar-Tass news agency reported.

The ecological group Greenpeace criticises indiscriminate logging by companies working Russian forests under leasing contracts rather than selective, sustainable forestry as practiced in other countries.


Siberian Water May Flow to Central Asia
United Press International, April 2, 2004
By Marina Kozlova

Tashkent -- Nearly 20 years after the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union vetoed a canal intended to bring water from Siberian rivers to Central Asia, the massive project still excites irrigators, scholars and politicians.

The 1,350-mile canal was planned to start near the Russian city of Khanty-Mansiysk, where the Irtysh River flows into the Ob, passing through Kazakhstan and reaching the Amu-Darya in northwestern Uzbekistan. It would be 220 yards wide and 17.6 yards deep.

The project, conceived in the 1970s, had a first stage that anticipated transferring 35.1 billion cubic yards of water per year and a second stage that would increase the transfer to 78 billion cubic yards annually, said Philip Micklin, professor emeritus of geography at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo.

For comparison, the Ob carries 410.8 billion cubic yards of water to the Kara Sea every year.

"The first stage was the one that was planned in detail and on which construction was about to begin in 1986 when the project was indefinitely postponed," Micklin told United Press International.

The canal was supposed to secure a significant increase in cotton production in Uzbekistan, according to Kadyrbek Bozov, director of a water management project for the Global Ecological Fund in Tashkent.

The transferred water would not have provided much help to the shrunk Aral Sea because the water was to be used in irrigation not for supplementing the Aral, Micklin said.

At the same time "environmental effects along the Lower Ob River in Siberia from the diversions would have been significant but, although claimed by some opponents, perceptible effects on the Kara Sea or Arctic were unlikely," he said.

In late 2002, Yuri Luzhkov, Moscow's mayor, sent a letter to Vladimir Putin, Russia's president, proposing to revive the project and build the canal that would give water to some Russian regions, as well as Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

Vadim Antonov, presently technical director of the Vodproekt association of the Uzbek Ministry of Agriculture and Water Industry, told UPI that Central Asia would not be able to do without water from Siberian rivers.

In the 20th century, the rate of land reclamation and developing new irrigated areas in Central Asia lagged behind the world rate of similar activities by 3.5 times. New irrigated land has not been developed in the region since 1986. At the same time, the rate of population growth in Central Asia has exceeded the average world rate, Antonov said.

"Central Asia can (and, probably, must) get along without Siberian water," Micklin said, and added the region has quite a lot of fresh water, mainly in the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers.

"A program to rebuild old and dilapidated irrigation systems could save a great deal of water that could be used for other purposes, including expanding irrigation," he said. "Such a program would be very expensive, but cheaper than diversions from Siberia."

Also, reform of agriculture and irrigation -- via institutional changes, land privatization, charging for water and so on -- could encourage farmers to save water, he said.

"These would be difficult programs to implement, but, in my view, easier and less complicated than bringing water from Siberia with all its costs and environmental and political problems," Micklin added.

In the more distant future, he said, Central Asia nations might be able to orient their economies away from irrigation.

The canal likely would take 10 to 20 years to finish and the cost of the first stage would probably run $40 billion, Micklin said. "The World Bank already has indicated it will not fund such a project. I doubt Russia would come up with the money."

The Central Asian states are in deep economic trouble and it is doubtful they could fund the project, he said.

"The main reason for placing the project in limbo was lack of economic justification. It was considered simply too costly for the benefits that might be gained," Micklin said.

"Presently, the region (the Aral Sea basin) does not need additional water," Viktor Dukhovny, director of the scientific and information center of the Central Asian interstate water commission, told UPI.

The Aral Sea basin can do without additional water until 2025, he said. At present, 3,120 cubic yards of water are available per person, per year in the basin, and various conservation measures taken by the region's countries should confine consumption to about 1,950 cubic yards per person, per year, he said.

About 35 million people live in the Aral Sea basin, covering part of the territories of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

"However, after 2025," Dukhovny added, "further population growth will proceed and by 2050 it (the population in the Aral Sea basin) will reach 100 million people and global warming effect on water resources will be maximum...(so) the necessity for additional water will be evident."

Another potential impediment to the project is the cost of water to consumers.

When the project was postponed in 1986, the cost of 1 cubic meter (1.3 cubic yards) of water was estimated to cost between 5 cents and 8 cents. Now, Luzhkov's letter acknowledged, the cost has increased to between 20 cents and 30 cents, Dukhovny said, which probably puts it beyond the range of most farmers.

Over the past 20 years, world prices for products from irrigated farms -- cotton, rice and hard wheat -- have fallen sharply.


Russian Scientists Find Atmosphere Less Polluted Than Previously Thought
BBC Monitoring International Reports, April 1, 2004
Source: RTR Russia TV, Moscow, in Russian 1600 gmt 1 Apr 04

(Presenter) The ecological situation in Russia is better than usually thought. This was the positive conclusion reached by scientists who spent two weeks travelling across Russia from east to west. Pavel Zarubin has this dispatch on the first nationwide ecological tests:

(Correspondent) The scientists are coming back to Moscow in a good mood. The first trip of their mobile observatory has been a great success. All the instruments - the very latest ozonometers and instruments for measuring the amount of carbon and oxygen in the atmosphere - worked perfectly. There is nothing like this mobile laboratory anywhere in the world, the experts insist. (Andrey Igayev, junior scientist at the Russian Academy of Sciences Atmospheric Physics Institute) The train crossed virtually the whole country. In a small period of time, we measure the atmosphere's main gaseous components at virtually one and the same time.

(Correspondent) Over two weeks, the observatory-on-wheels travelled from Moscow to Khabarovsk and back again. Samples were taken in big towns and out in the taiga. That the atmosphere is badly polluted over major cities like Yekaterinburg or Novosibirsk didn't come as a particular surprise to the scientists but the results of research near Lake Baykal were not a pleasant find. It turned out that concentrations of sulphur, nitrogen and hydrocarbons are so far above the permitted level in this unique nature zone that even Moscow doesn't look bad by comparison.

Moreover, the ozone layer over Siberia is far thinner than the normal level at present but specialists say there's no need to worry and attribute the anomaly to flows of cold air from the Arctic.

(Nikolay Yelanskiy, head of the atmospheric components research department at the Russian Academy of Sciences Atmospheric Physics Institute) The ozone content over this area is down at the moment by comparison with the Earth's average but it's not as low as it was in the Antarctic a few years ago when was actually a threat to humans.

(Correspondent) Another unexpected result of the research was that nature makes pollution of its own. The volume of emissions from transport and factories has fallen somewhat but harmful compounds enter the atmosphere, for example, from swamps.

A vast number of harmful substances enter Russia from abroad. Foreign scientists like to say that Russia has huge ecological problems but they are brought in, as they say, in bucket-loads from Europe.

Nevertheless, the main and the most pleasant news is that our country's atmosphere is not as badly polluted as was said in the past. For example, there has been a 10-fold drop in the concentration of the so-called greenhouse gas, methane. Scientists from other countries agree - they travelled with the expedition.

(Dale Hurst, senior scientists at the (US) National Weather Service, speaking in English, correspondent provides Russian) According to our preliminary calculations, the state of the atmosphere in Russia has considerably improved of late, perhaps because your country has begun to make domestic appliances that do not harm the environment.

(Passage omitted) (Correspondent) The results of the research will be carefully processed in the near future and in a few months' time the scientists will be setting off again.


Police Foil Attempt to Smuggle Large Batch of Timber in Russia's Far East
BBC Monitoring International Reports, March 29, 2004
Source: Channel One TV, Moscow, in Russian 0500 gmt 29 Mar 04

(Presenter) The largest consignment of illegally procured valuable timber over the last few years has been seized in Khabarovsk Territory. The economic and environmental damage caused by the illegal loggers exceeds 1.5m dollars. Despite the high clear-up rate for the crimes, the scale of the illegal business in the Far East has not decreased so far. Vladimir Voropayev reports.

(Correspondent) This section of the Ussuriyskaya taiga is a nature reserve. Not only logging but also in principle any economic activity is prohibited here. Exactly here the teams of illegal loggers did their business. The loggers were caught red-handed. The lorries of logs were ready for shipping.

The loggers are interested only in valuable species: ash, oak, cedar and lime. Moreover, they take only the middle, the most massive part of the sawn off trunks, and throw away the rest. This is the specific hallmark of the illegal loggers. The taiga is literally ground by the caterpillar tracks of tractors and cross-country vehicles. All the machinery has no state number plates. As a rule, the hired workers even do not know who owns it.

(Aleksey Stefanchuk, investigator at the environment protection prosecutor's office) To justify themselves, they have said that they did not fell the trees but simply transported the procured timber. (They said) We ordinary locals of the villages have no jobs, no money. That is all.

(Correspondent) However, the detectives have no doubts that trees are illegally felled on the order of organized criminal groups. It is known it is the theft mafia, the so-called obshchag (hostel), that controls most of the deals concerning exports of timber and other natural resources.

(Anatoliy Zolotarev, head of the Russian Interior Ministry Main Directorate in the Far Eastern Federal District) A total of 23 gangs were brought to book. Their 219 members are part of the obshchag in the Far East. The work in this area is continuing.

(Correspondent) The number of crimes cleared up in the forest area doubled on the previous year. However, the scale of the illegal business has not declined. The damage the loggers cause the state every year amounts to billions of roubles.


Global Warming Good for Climate of South Russia - Scientists
ITAR-TASS News Agency, March 16, 2004
By Darya Tokareva

Global warming is good for the climate of South Russia, department head from the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute of Atmospheric Physics Nikolai Yelansky told Itar-Tass.

"Global warming will not turn southern districts of Russia into a desert, as it was believed in the past. It will change easterly winds to westerly in Kalmykia, the Stavropol territory, the Astrakhan and Rostov regions, and bring plenty of precipitation," he said.

The changed winds will clear the atmosphere, Yelansky noted. "The easterly wind, which currently dominates in South Russia, brings manmade and natural pollution, while the westerly wind will bring clean air," he stressed.

"Lengthy monitoring of the atmosphere in South Russia shows that global warming will make the climate milder, there will be no sharp fluctuations of temperatures and weather," Yelansky said. "A mobile observatory, which will monitor the atmosphere of southern districts before the end of this year," will give more precise information, he added.


Code Seeks Forest Investors
The St. Petersburg Times, March 19, 2004
By Sophia Kornienko

Environmentalists fear the new Forestry Code approved by the federal government Thursday could lead to mass cutting of high-quality forests around cities, on riverbanks and lakeshores. The Northwest region, they warn, is likely to be affected most by the new legislation, which - in their view - gives a green light to indiscriminate privatization of forests.

Many regional governors are also against the new code.

Sergei Katanandov, head of the Republic of Karelia, spoke against the code's forest leasing procedure.

"We are very much concerned about using only auctions to select tenants. It is a dangerous initiative, making money the only winning factor," Katanandov said in St. Petersburg on Tuesday.

It is essential to either preserve the competition-based selection of tenants or require that auction participants present detailed business plans, Katanandov said.

Vyacheslav Pozgalyov, head of the Vologda region, was quoted by Vedomosti on Thursday as saying that the code "totally contradicts the concept of distribution of authority." The code does not expand regional mandates, but limits them even further, he said.

Greenpeace is concerned that the code has been devised by a narrow circle of executives with almost no public discussion, the environmental watchdog's press service reported Wednesday. No practicing forestry experts from the regions or representatives of public organizations were invited to help create the code, the Greenpeace statement said.

According to the new code, tenants can purchase a lease for only ten times the annual rental price after 15 years of renting forested land. Short-term (less than one year) and long-term (from 10 to 99 years) leases will be available only at auction. At present, use of forested land is granted on the basis of competition or permission from a local administration.

Both legal entities and individuals, Russian and foreign, can become tenants. Foreign tenants are not permitted to rent forested land near the country's borders.

Federal authorities have had difficulty supervising the country's forests and protecting them from illegal cutting, Natural Resources Minister Yury Trutnev said Thursday. "State officers have been responsible for 54,000 square meters of forest each," Trutnev said. "Now the forest will have a master," he said.

Trutnev said the code aims to attract investments, which will lead to construction of new roads, pulp and paper mills and wood processing plants.

Forest privatization should be introduced, but gradually and discriminatingly, said Viktor Teryoshkin, deputy editor in chief of Ecology and Law magazine. The new code allows for rapid acquisition of property without distinction, "just as with other lucrative resources, such as oil," he said. No exception is made for so-called first-category forests - the concept of especially protected forests introduced under Joseph Stalin during World War II, Teryoshkin noted.

Old-growth forests could now be logged, Teryoshkin said.

Economic Development and Trade Minister German Gref, whose ministry drafted the code, maintains it is environmentally sound and protects forests, including first-category forests, with a few exceptions, Interfax quoted Gref as saying Thursday.

The code is expected to come into effect soon, leaving environmentalists with little choice in the matter. "It is as if we were being run over by a steamroller," Teryoshkin said.


Russian Government Approves Private Ownership of Forests
BBC Monitoring International Reports, March 18, 2004

Moscow -- The Russian government today approved the draft Forestry Code, Natural Resources Minister Yuriy Trutnev told reporters after today's cabinet meeting. Trutnev also noted that, thanks to the adoption of this document, "forests will finally have a manager who will ensure that forests are accessible".

Trutnev went on to say that the Forestry Code is primarily aimed at resolving ownership issues. We must determine to whom the forests are going to belong, he said. According to him, "70 per cent of forests have no owner". Trutnev also pointed out that "each person in charge of forested territory is responsible for 54,000 square kilometres". However, Trutnev continued, the new document fully resolves the issue of public access to forests. We will have no problems "with mushroom and berry picking, or the collection of wood for heating in the private sector", Trutnev stressed. "People will have every opportunity to visit forests," he said.

Until now the Forestry Code adopted in 1997 has been in effect. According to that document, all Russian forests have been under federal ownership. Under the new document, the tenant, if there have been no violations of the code's requirements and once a 10-year lease has expired, has the right to buy his area of forest.

Materials prepared for the cabinet meeting by the Economic Development and Trade Ministry stress that certain categories of forest under so-called "protection regimes" will not be subject to purchase. For example, such areas of forest include forest parks near towns and villages, nature reserves, forests adjacent to tundra, areas of forest running along federal railway lines and federal highways, as well as some other categories.

The right to use forested areas will be determined by lease agreements. The draft Forestry Code proposes that two kinds of lease agreements can be concluded, either for a period of up to one year, when logging cannot be carried out on that area, or for a period from 10 to 99 years. Lease agreements would be concluded through open auctions. Two months before an auction is held, its conditions have to be published in the press.

The Economic Development and Trade Ministry believes that the new Forestry Code will make it possible to attract investment into the forestry sector.

Forests make up almost two-thirds of Russian territory (69 per cent of dry land). The total area of Russia's forestry stock is 11.7m square kilometres. Timber reserves come to about 82bn cubic metres (over a quarter of world reserves). This makes it possible for Russia not only to fully provide for its domestic requirements, but also to export timber. Russia is second in the world in terms of exporting uncut timber.


Russian Forest Experts Criticise Draft Forest Code
ITAR-TASS News Agency, March 11, 2004
By Serafim Bykhun

Kursk -- An expanded meeting of forest experts of the Kursk Region and deputies to the Kursk regional Duma discussed on Thursday a new version of the draft Forest Code.

"The government actually insists on the privatisation of Russian forests, explaining it by the need for increasing the gross domestic product (GDP) and attracting investments to the forest sector. The draft Forest Code almost totally removes the regions from the management of the forests and puts them under the control of the federal centre. In addition to that, state management of forests will be replaced by private management," Vasili Vyvodtsev, chief forest expert of the Kursk Region, said at the meeting. According to Vyvodtsev, the Forest Code is a sort of a constitution for forest experts, a law, on the basis of which they could resolve numerous problems of the forest sector.

In the opinion of Valery Anastasov, director of the regional department for the use of natural resources and for geology, the draft Forest Code will permit owners of forest sections to keep people away from forests and to ban their stay there, the way it is being done at inland water reservoirs. Private owners will be interested, in the first place, in increasing timber production and not in improving our forests.

"Why market-based economy means privatisation and nothing else? Why not leasing under state control?" asked Nikolai Kononov, deputy chairman of the regional Duma.


Russia's Call on Global Warming
M2 PRESSWIRE, March 10, 2004 Commentary by Jonathan Lash, president of the World Resources Institute:

Early this year, I moderated a panel on climate change at the World Economic Forum, the global gathering of business and political leaders, pundits, and experts that takes place every year in Davos, Switzerland. The forum's organizers, drawing on an article by a distinguished scientist who joined us, had provocatively titled the panel "Global Climate Change: Mother Nature's Weapon of Mass Destruction?" The discussion was full of surprises.

One of the panelists was Russian President Vladimir Putin's economic advisor, Andrei Illarionov, who had stunned climate negotiators a few weeks earlier by announcing that he expected Russia would not ratify the Kyoto Protocol. The future of the Kyoto emissions-reduction agreement, negotiated in 1997, has been hanging in the balance ever since it was rejected by U.S. President George W. Bush.

Without U.S. participation, Russia is now the only hope for the future of Kyoto, which is supported by most of the rest of the world. Although the European Union has said that it will implement Kyoto even if it doesn't come into force, without binding agreements Europe will face intense internal pressure not to impose the costs of programs to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions when the rest of the world isn't doing so.

In Davos Dr. Illarionov reiterated his assertion that Russia would reject the Protocol, and gave an explanation that startled business leaders and climate experts alike. There was, he said, no scientific evidence of global warming.

Instead, he told the audience, the greater threat was global cooling. Russia would not accept Kyoto obligations, which, he insisted, would limit the growth of the country's economy.

Another panelist, Sir John Houghton, a leading climate scientist, noted that the evidence of human-caused warming is now overwhelming. Not only were 1998, 2002, and 2003 the hottest in the past thousand years, but the evidence of global warming's physical impacts are mounting with the passing of every day, as scientists record new findings on rising sea levels, disruptive ecological shifts, and melting glaciers and ice caps.

But Illarionov seemed as deaf to those arguments as he was to questions about why Russia would worry about Kyoto imposing limits on his country's growth. The protocol's caps are based on 1990 emissions levels, and would allow Russia significant room to grow its emissions since the country's energy use has significantly declined in the past decade. In fact, under Kyoto Russia would reap substantial profits from the sale of surplus emission allowances to other countries.

Since Illarionov made his proclamation, a number of other Russian officials have presented completely different - and far more encouraging - public statements. In December, senior trade minister Muhammad Tsikhanov said, "There are no decisions on ratification of the Kyoto Protocol apart from the fact that we are moving toward ratification." What's going on?

One possibility is that Russia is waiting to see whether key ratifying nations - Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Japan - offer additional inducements for Russian ratification. The withdrawal of the United States reduced the prospective demand for, and thus the value of those surplus Russian emission allowances, the so-called "Russian hot air." Russia may be using Kyoto ratification as a bargaining chip in other negotiations with Europe, including WTO admission, energy investments, and debt relief.

In 2004, leaders in Europe and Japan will either find means to persuade Russia to ratify, or Kyoto will fail. If these negotiations fail, the only concrete step nations have agreed upon to protect the climate will evaporate.

Kyoto is not a perfect agreement, but its collapse would be a huge setback for climate negotiations, and undercut those companies that have taken voluntary steps to measure and reduce their emissions. With so much in the balance, this is an opportunity for real political leadership in Russia and Europe. And the outcome will have lasting repercussions for generations to come. (WRI Features).


Press Conference with Minister of Natural Resources Yuri Trutnev
Official Kremlin Int'l News Broadcast, March 10, 2004
[
FOLLOWING ARE SELECTED EXCERPTS FROM NEWS ARTICLE]

Moderator: Good day. I am glad to welcome Yuri Trutnev who was appointed Minister of Natural Resources yesterday. We have less than half an hour and I am very grateful to Yuri Petrovich for finding time to answer our questions on such a busy day.

Trutnev: I am glad to welcome all the representatives of the mass media. With your permission I will introduce myself. I was born on March 1, 1956 in the city of Perm. I have lived in that city all my life. Over the last four years I have been the head of the city of Perm and over the past three years I have been the governor of the Perm oblast. And you know about my appointment yesterday. And I am now ready to answer any of your questions.

Q: Reportedly, some functions of the Federal Service of Geodesy and Cartography has been transferred to your agency.

. . . So far I am familiar with the overall structure of the ministry, but as for concrete functions, human resources and priorities, I would be glad to answer these questions within two or three weeks, realistically speaking.

Q: Will the Ministry tighten requirements to the users of natural resources?

Trutnev: I have said that I would prefer to talk about strategy a little later. Nevertheless, I can say even now that the issue is not to tighten measures. In different situations the Ministry should take different positions because the task is to balance the interests of the state, and the users of natural resources. The challenge now is not to toughen the requirements, but to make them understandable and transparent so that every person should have a clear answer why the Ministry for Natural Resources takes this stand. And the benefits should be made clear both for the state and for economic entities. What cannot be tolerated is an opaque position when the Ministry says we are doing it because we think it is right.

One of the main tasks, as I see it, is to achieve a transparent and clear relationship between society and the Ministry. In my view, this is not the case at present.

Q: We face the task of reforming the legislation on the use of natural resources. What path will you take? The former leadership of your ministry differed on the issue with the Ministry for Economic Development.

Trutnev: I don't think we will have differences with the Ministry for Economic Development. We have long been interacting with German Oskarovich Gref on a lot of other issues and I hope we will be able to find common ground on these issues as well. The questions of cooperation in drawing up corresponding codes, you know, the water, forest and mineral resources codes have practically been solved. We will work together.

Q: I have two questions to you. How do you intend to combat the illegal felling of trees which have acquired a massive scale and do you support the policy of the previous minister Artyukhov in regard to preserves?

Trutnev: I think it is already a third time so let us meet again to discuss priorities a month from now. And as regards the cutting out of forests, you have raised an important topic, so I cannot leave it without responding. To be honest, I don't know it now, I don't know the answer to this question. I can see that the problem is there, moreover, we already were beginning to get down to it quite seriously in Perm region. And in general, Perm region is a micro model of Russia where there is almost everything that you can find in the Russian Federation in terms of minerals. We have oil, we have a little gas, we have 30 percent of potassium deposits of Russia, we have vast areas of forests, and we also have diamonds and gold and so on. That means we have today practically everything that today constitutes the natural wealth. This exists in Perm this way or the other.

Now concerning the forests. We also came to face this problem. It is a painful problem. There is quite a lot of loopholes that are being vigorously utilized by our compatriots simply just to loot, pardon the expression. How to block those practices? One would think that administrative measures alone, like commanding the militia to check transport at the checkpoints more rigorously and so on, do not seem to work. We have to think differently about it. I will honestly admit to you that I don't know now how to solve the problem. I agree that the problem exists and I will try to solve it. Other questions?

Q: ... (inaudible)...

Trutnev: Concerning the natural preserves, I will take time out to study it for the simple reason that I did not deal with this topic, I have lived and I still am living outside Moscow, as to the situation in the "non-Moscow" part of Russia, I know it much better than the situation in Moscow and I don't like to behave laymanlike and so I would not like to give you answers for which I will not be able to bear responsibility. I promise you a different thing, namely, that what I am telling you, I am telling it sincerely and what I declare, I will try to accomplish this in my work. So, in regard to the natural preserves, I have not yet studied the situation and so I am not prepared to take decisions.

Q: Do you share the position of your predecessor in the Yukos affair? Will the story of how to make the Tundra green and how to increase multiplication of rabits, continue?

Moderator: You will excuse me, but we have already discussed the topic but they offer it again.

Trutnev: Let me say that I am convinced of one thing, namely, that the attitude of the state and its Ministry of Natural Resources to all the subjects of economic space must be equal, clear and transparent. And I will try to accomplish this by all means. You asked me about licenses and I was not avoiding answering but I consciously decided not to answer. Why? It is because I know how well this is happening in the region. I know that we have, regrettably, such "users of nature" who simply obtained licenses and are not doing anything with them. In my opinion this does damage to the Russian economy and so this is wrong.

We have just talked to the leadership of Interfax and I fully support their position. It is correct when the Ministry of Natural Resources again publicly places information on its site and says: "Ladies and gentlemen, this is the list of companies that do not comply with the licensing agreement in regard to the following items. This will be the first little warning bell and then after a certain time we will be inviting them and raising the question of revoking the license." This is correct in regard to the society and to the state because one cannot allow a situation in which someone gets many licenses but will not use them but rather will trade in them instead of using them and this would not be just.

Q: The existing criteria of compliance and non-compliance with the agreement -- are they understandable to you? Or you will be revoking licenses?

Trutnev: It is slightly different. The criteria are understandable but the question whether they are sufficient and whether they have always been clearly formulated. In principle the creatia are understandable. Most often they have to do with the following: in reality there is the use of nature, there are certain economic agents that do not comply or say they procrastinate in their dialogue with the state, trying in this way to use the rights given. In general, this is understandable.

But a licensing agreement, in a "border area" between the state and the region, should be more clearly detailed. We must understand what a licensing agreement should include and it is a topic apart and we must understand how correctly they are concluded.


World-Largest Remote Sensing Centre Opens in Russia
ITAR-TASS News Agency, March 2, 2004 (By Yelena Zubtsova)

The world's largest centre for reception and processing of data of space sensing of the earth opened in Khanty-Mansiisk on Tuesday.

"The centre of the world level has been created in Russia for the first time. It can receive and process information from all satellites for remote probing of the earth, both Russian and foreign ones," a spokesman for the Russian Aerospace Agency, Konstantin Kreidenko told Itar-Tass.

The data from space will allow forecasting forest fires, slides of glaciers and other natural disasters, and managing these emergencies, he said.

Cannabis and opium poppy plantations also can be detected in any part of the world from the satellites.

The data of remote probing are helpful in geology, agriculture and other economic sectors.

Kreidenko said specialists of the centre would file in a digital format the telemetric returns from space.

"Information can be rapidly received through high-speed lines from satellites with a resolution of one-two meters," Kreidenko said.

Two satellites will add to Russia's remote probing system this year.

A Resurs-DK satellite will be launched from the Baikonur cosmodrome and Resurs-F2 from Plesetsk.

The system comprises Meteor-2M and Monitor-E satellites.

The Khanty-Mansiisk centre will also receive information from Ukraine's satellite Sich-1M and the West's SPOT, Landsat and IRS," Kreidenko said.


Polar Thaw Opens Arctic Sea Route
The Daily Telegraph(London), March 04, 2004 (By Julius Strauss)

As ice recedes, the North-East Passage could rival Suez

Murmansk -- A fabled Arctic sea route which claimed the lives of countless sailors during the Age of Exploration looks set to be transformed into a busy shipping lane connecting Europe and Asia.

Shipping experts say that as the polar ice recedes the notorious North-East Passage, which winds its way along Russia's frigid and barren northern coastline past Siberia, could come to rival the Suez Canal as a global trade route.

Scientists say the Arctic icecap has been rapidly thawing, arguably due to global warming, and is shrinking at the rate of about three per cent a decade. The ice is half as thick as it was 50 years ago.

On present calculations, the North-East Passage could be open to year-round commercial shipping within a decade, making it a viable economic alternative to the southern route through Suez, which is much longer.

Russia is also shedding some of its Cold War reluctance to allow foreigners to use its Arctic waters and officials are talking of upgrading neglected facilities along the forgotten northern coastline.

The result may be a seismic shift in global shipping patterns that have changed little since the opening of the Suez and Panama canals a century ago.

Douglas Brubaker, an expert with the Fridtjof Nansens Institute in Norway, said: "With the ice reduction, the third you can save off distances and the security implications of not having to use Suez, the northern route has a lot going for it."

The North-East Passage has offered the possibility of a short cut for shipping between Europe and Asia for hundreds of years. Its mapping was once considered a global priority.

The first serious attempts at finding a navigable path through the ice were made by English and Dutch sailors in the 16th Century. They were spurred by the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans, who closed the spice routes between Europe and the Far East.

Willem Barents led a team of Dutch sailors through the Arctic waters, but they died after becoming trapped in the ice.

Henry Hudson also made attempts in 1607 and 1608, but was forced back by icebergs. In 1648 a Cossack named Semyon Dezhnyov, seeking furs, completed most of the passage. Vitus Bering, a Danish officer serving in the Russian navy, finally passed through the straits that would come to bear his name.

During those pioneering voyages hundreds of sailors died of scurvy or cold and conditions on board were so terrible that at one point the tsar withdrew his backing.

Despite the losses, the full potential of the route was never realised. When the Suez Canal was completed in 1869 the importance of the North-East Passage faded.

In the 20th century the Soviet Arctic region became a backwater, sealed behind the Iron Curtain.

Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, western shipping agents continued to shun the passage because of the unpredictable ice, labyrinthine Russian bureaucracy and aggressive posturing by the Red Army.

Now that could all be about to change. Scientists predict that if present weather patterns continue the entire stretch could be ice-free within a century.

The economics are in the northern route's favour. A journey through the North-East Passage from Europe to Japan is 7,000 nautical miles long and takes 22 days. A comparative trip through the Suez canal is 11,000 nautical miles and takes 35 days.

In Murmansk, a frigid, Soviet-built town of 500,000 perched on the Barents Sea coast, talk of a new era of prosperity has energised the local shipping industry. The fleet of Soviet nuclear ice-breakers is being overhauled.

Russian agents envisage a flood of new contracts for their ice-breakers, repair shops and specialists and tens of thousands of new jobs ashore supporting convoys moving along the coast.

Alexander Medvedev, the director of the Murmansk Shipping Company, said: "Companies don't want to invest in ice-class vessels if they can ship only three or four months of the year.

"When we can ship all the year round the tonnage will increase rapidly." But some experts say there are still obstacles to cross before the centuries-old dream of a commercial trade route along the North-East Passage becomes reality.

Insurance companies still charge premiums two or three times higher than for ships on the Suez route and insist they are built with hugely expensive ice-class hulls. Norwegian coastal authorities are expected to demand the same.

Nor have the Russians helped their case by demanding unrealistically high transit fees even as they were forced to admit to insurers that up to 20 per cent of their ships had been damaged while negotiating the passage.


Worse than in Africa
RusData Dialine - Russian Press Digest, March 2, 2004
By Dmitry Bulgakov, Andrey Panov, Boris Grozovsky
Source: Vedomosti, No 35, p.A2

A study says the quality of life in the Russia's cities has deteriorated.

Experts of the consulting company Mercer Human Resource Consulting have released a study showing that the quality of life in Russian cities is worsening. Last year Russia's largest metropolises were on par with the cities of Vietnam, Nigeria, Sudan and Cameroon. While from the point of view of medical services and sanitary conditions they ranked even lower than cities in Africa. Mercer Human Resource Consulting prepares its study basing upon questioning of foreign professionals, working in various countries. 215 cities were included in the rating published yesterday.

Moscow ranked 162nd (last year it was No. 159), St. Petersburg ranked 157th (156), Novosibirsk - 186th (183) and Kazan - 188th (186). Russian cities ranked not only below Eastern European capitals, but even below some African metropolises, and ranked equally with such cities as Mumbai (India), Maputo (Mozambique) and Lagos (Nigeria).

The consulting company's study took into account such aspects as political, economic, social and cultural environment in the city, quality of medical services, entertainment, climate, etc.


Russian Government Plans to Sell off Forests Within 15 Years - Minister
BBC Monitoring International Reports, March 2, 2004

Moscow -- The draft Forestry Code, which is currently under development by the Russian government, proposes introducing private ownership of forests 15 years after a plot of forest is leased, Russian Deputy Prime Minister and Agriculture Minister Aleksey Gordeyev told reporters today.

In this way, he believes, the draft is not aimed at a speedy introduction of private ownership of forests but it does propose the idea of ownership as such, Prime-TASS reports. "Naturally, society is not capable of immediately directing the processes that emerge in connection with introducing the ownership of forest resources," Gordeyev admitted. Therefore it is necessary to create the conditions to prepare for the functioning of the institution of private ownership of forests in Russia.

Gordeyev said the government would be discussing the draft Forestry Code in March and added that it would aim to take a "balanced and comprehensible" decision.


Ministry of Natural Resources and Khabarovsk Administration Plan to Cooperate on Forest Legislation RIA OREANDA, January 19, 2004

Khabarovsk -- The general department of natural resources at the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources and Administration of the Khabarovsk region plan to create a joint commission to eliminate violations of forest legislation and to improve the system of forest management on territory of the region, according to press service of the Ministry.

The decision on establishment of the commission was made as the result of the meeting in the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources with participation of officials from Khabarovsk territory Administration. The meeting was presided by first deputy Minister of Natural Resources and head of State Forest Service at the Ministry of Natural Resources Valery Roshchupkin.

It is important to remind that during examinations carried out by the Ministry of Natural Resources in the Khabarovsk territory (in November-December of 2003) serious violations in forest management were registered.

Thus, the territorial commission for forest management several times made decisions on leasing of forest lots as the result of a forest competition and only one application for a forest lot. By the moment of examination by the Ministry of Natural Resources (in 2003) 19 resolutions were issued by the head of territorial administration. The resolutions were concerned with transfer of forest lots to the list of non-forests in 3 rd group forests.

Still, in 9 cases (transfer of lots for gold mining) the state ecological expertise was not performed. Besides, according to resolutions of the head of administration, forest lots were provided (leasing terms) for gold mining, building of gas pipelines, etc. at the same time, which is a gross violation of the item On leasing of forest lots (confirmed in RF Government) determining that forest lots may be provided only for one kind of forest exploitation activity.


The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development
Daniel & Daniel Publishers, Inc. www.rfebook.com By Josh Newell

NEW BOOK ANNOUNCEMENT

With contributions from an interdisciplinary team of ninety specialists, The Russian Far East is the most comprehensive English-language reference text on the region to be published in more than a decade. The book - a result of six years of research - summarizes and reviews the geography, ecology, natural resources, major industries, infrastructure, foreign trade and investment, demographics, and legal structure. Particular attention is devoted to how the region can develop in an environmentally sustainable way. Unlike other books written solely by western experts, Russian contributors living and working in the area provide an unparalleled local perspective. The Russian Far East will appeal to a wide-audience -- including those working in media, business, academia, government agencies, and nongovernmental organizations.

This book will be the definitive English-language reference source on the environment in the vast region known as the Russian Far East. -- Michael Biggins, University of Washington Libraries

An indispensable resource. -- Terry Choate, Scribe Consulting

BOOK HIGHLIGHTS

" Strategic resources -- oil and gas, timber, gold, diamonds, and more -- Where they are located and who is using them
" Foreign investment -- Where it is headed and which corporations are involved
" Emerging Environmental Issues -- Which issues are crucial for the region
" Biological diversity hotspots -- Which forests, tundra, wetlands, and marine areas are crucial for species conservation
" Mega-development plans -- Where and why the Russian government continues to promote huge development schemes
" Corruption in the timber and fisheries sectors -- Why the government has so far been unable to curb it.


Russia and the Kyoto Protocol. Johnson's Russia List Research and Analytical Supplement (JRL RAS), No. 20, January 2004 By Stephen D. Shenfield

After long hesitation, the Russian government has decided not to ratify, at least in its present form, the Kyoto Protocol on limiting the emission of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming. Re-negotiation of the agreement to Russia's satisfaction seems unlikely. With Kyoto rejected by the US, Australia, and Russia, its doom is sealed: the threshold of participation required to activate the treaty cannot be reached. Now the world community will have to start over again and work out a new approach to the limitation of greenhouse gas emissions. (1) In order to understand the vagaries of Russian policy on Kyoto, the following factors need to be taken into account:

[1] Russian perceptions of global warming and its implications for Russia

[2] Russian perceptions of the likely economic costs and benefits of Russia's participation in the Kyoto mechanism

[3] Relations within the triangle US--EU--Russia

[4] Russian attitudes concerning the international distribution of the costs of mitigating global warming

Of these four factors, the first two are the most crucial. The third factor may also be important. The fourth factor may be rather less important.

[1] Russian perceptions of global warming and its implications for Russia

The number of people in Russia who have a good scientific understanding of global warming and its full implications is probably quite small. Only a handful of Russian specialists have participated in the massive international scientific effort to assess global warming. Thus four Russians contributed to the text of the main report of the Third Working Group of the Intergovernmental Panel of Experts on Climate Change; only one, the economist Igor Bashmakov, took part in drafting the Summary for Policymakers and the Technical Summary.

There appears even to be some uncertainty in high places about the reality of global warming. In July, Putin's influential economic adviser Andrei Illarionov stated: "There have been no serious studies confirming that global warming is taking place." (2) If this statement was made in good faith, it reveals an astonishing ignorance of the scientific evidence. Possibly it reflects the intellectual influence of the Bush administration.

Lacking a deep understanding of the issue, many Russians take the natural but naive attitude that a cold country like Russia could do with some warming. "We'll need to spend less money on fur coats and grain harvests will increase," remarked Putin at the World Climate Change Conference that was held in Moscow from September 29 to October 3, 2003. (3)

At the same conference, Doctor of Medical Sciences Boris Revich (Institute for Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences) listed some of the negative consequences of global warming for Russia:

* an increase in droughts, floods, and extreme weather phenomena

* degradation of the permafrost, expansion of swamplands

* a sharp rise in parasitic intestinal infections, malaria, and tick diseases (4)

There is a conflict of regional interests on this issue, because the effects of global warming on Russia will vary considerably by region. It cannot be excluded that the net effect over large areas of central and north-central Russia will be positive. At the same time, the south and the far north will suffer badly:

-- Southern Russia can expect more drought, soil erosion, desertification (already far advanced in Kalmykia) in the worst affected areas, and the spread of tropical diseases (e.g. cholera). The impact on Central Asia will be even more disastrous as the mountain glaciers on which the region depends for its water melt away. (5)

-- The far north will become uninhabitable and unusable as the permafrost layer melts, turning the tundra into impassable swampland. (6) This will reduce the benefits anticipated from the melting of the Arctic ice, which will turn the Arctic Ocean into an open navigable sea.

[2] Russian perceptions of the likely economic costs and benefits of Russia's participation in the Kyoto mechanism

The dominant theme in Russian discussion of the Kyoto Protocol is the balance of its economic costs and benefits to Russia. Both Russian and foreign (primarily European) supporters of the agreement have tried to persuade Russian policymakers to ratify it by stressing the money that Russia can make by selling its unused emission quotas.

Let us consider an article in this vein by Igor Bashmakov, whom I mentioned above. (7) The author argues that as a result of the decline in Russian industrial output in the 1990s Russia has, albeit involuntarily, sacrificed more than any other country for the cause of stabilizing global greenhouse gas emissions. By selling its unused emission quotas, Russia will obtain partial compensation for its losses. He urges that the proceeds be invested in projects to improve the energy efficiency of Russian industry. (Bashmakov is director of the Center for Energy Efficiency.) Besides its ecological virtues, improved energy efficiency is an important goal for Russia on purely economic grounds. This will also reduce the risk that at a later stage of its economic growth (in ten years' time or so) Russia will have to limit its industrial output and/or buy emission quotas in order to remain within the Kyoto emission limits.

Bashmakov complains that "highly placed persons" do not understand the opportunities that flexible use of the Kyoto mechanism offers Russia, regarding them as "illusory." He compares their attitude to the blindness of an earlier generation of Soviet officials concerning cybernetics. Similarly, Igor Leshukov, director of the Institute for International Affairs in St. Petersburg, comments that Russian leaders do not perceive revenue from trading in emission quotas as "real" money. (8)

One highly placed person who recently called the potential for Russia to sell quotas "completely illusory" is Putin aide Illarionov. Even on a conservative forecast of Russia's growth, he argued, Russia will switch from being a seller to a buyer of quotas by 2013-14. Even in 2008-12 (the "commitment period"), the supply of quotas from Russia, Ukraine, and Central and Eastern Europe will far exceed the modest demand from Japan and the EU. He also expressed concern that the sale of quotas might be restricted to emission reductions that are achieved by a certified environmental program designed for that purpose. (9)

But the main concern of Russian opponents of the Kyoto Protocol is that its limits on emission will constrain Russia's future economic growth (10) and "doom Russia to poverty, weakness, and backwardness." (11) Evidently they are not convinced by the counter-argument of Kyoto's supporters, who emphasize that what is needed to halt global warming is not the suppression of growth as such but rather its redirection into more energy-efficient channels. This seems strange, because improving the energy efficiency of the Russian economy is an officially proclaimed goal. In May 2003, when the Russian government was still (at least in principle) in favor of the Kyoto Protocol, prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov said that Russia could and should reduce its energy consumption per unit of GDP by 50 percent in five years. However, Igor Bashmakov doubted that such an ambitious target could be achieved: the resources being devoted to improving energy efficiency were grossly insufficient. (12) Real commitment to an energy-efficient growth path is clearly weak.

Might the Russian government's rejection of Kyoto have something to do with pressure from powerful economic lobbies? In fact, several big Russian corporations have lobbied in favor of ratifying the protocol. Evidently THEY do not think that the prospect of profitable trading in emission quotas is illusory. (13) I have not come across reports of any corporations lobbying against ratification. So it is unlikely that this is the impetus behind the shift in the government's position.

[3] Relations within the triangle US--EU--Russia

Might at least part of the explanation lie in the field of international politics -- specifically, in Russia's relations with the United States on the one hand and with the European Union on the other? Russian officials, including Putin, have expressed discomfort at the intense pressure that the EU has been exerting on Russia to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. (14) At the same time, observers suspect that the US has been maneuvering behind the scenes to block Russian ratification. If such maneuvers have played a decisive role, the Russian decision represents a diplomatic victory for the US over Europe. How far world politics has moved away from the Cold War pattern!

Putin has tried to balance Russia's relations with the US and with the EU. His discomfort may owe much to being forced to take sides when he wants to avoid alienating either Western power. A Russian government with a more pro-European or anti-American strategic orientation may have made quite a different choice.

[4] Russian attitudes concerning the international distribution of the costs of mitigating global warming

Illarionov and other Russian spokesmen have complained that the Kyoto Protocol distributes the burden of mitigating global warming among countries in an unjust fashion. (15)

* On the one hand, the withdrawal of the US in itself makes the agreement unjust. Why should Russia make sacrifices that the US, a much richer country, is unwilling to make?

* On the other hand, it is unjust that rapidly industrializing countries conventionally categorized as "developing" -- in particular, China and India -- should be spared any obligations under the agreement.

In objecting to the fact that Kyoto imposes constraints only on "developed" countries, Russia shares common ground with the US. However, Russia has stronger grounds for complaint. According to a view widely held among Russian economists, Russia, China, and India are at approximately the same "semi-developed" level of development. In that case, it is arbitrary and anachronistic to label Russia as part of the developed world (North) and China and India as parts of a contrasting developing world (South).

It is difficult to judge whether the issue of unjust distribution of the burden is one of the real reasons behind Russia's rejection of Kyoto or simply a pretext or post hoc rationalization. Would Russia accept an agreement that distributed the burden in some other way?

NOTES

(1) For an explanation of one new approach, called "contraction and convergence," see Fred Pearce, Saving the World, Plan B, New Scientist, December 13, 2003.
(2) Sergei Blagov, Cybercast News Service, September 9, 2003
(3) Sergei Leskov, Global News Wire, October 4, 2003
(4) Ibid.
(5) See RAS No. 9 item 6.
(6) See my piece on global warming in JRL 5145, and also Steve Connor, The Frozen North is Under Threat, The Independent, December 11, 2003.
(7) The article appeared in the January 2003 issue of Voprosy ekonomiki [Questions of Economics]. My translation of it was published in Problems of Economic Transition (M.E. Sharpe, NY), vol. 46, no. 4, August 2003, pp. 78-96.
(8) Greg Walters, St. Petersburg Times, August 5, 2003.
(9) Remarks made at a seminar at the Carnegie Center in Moscow on December 16, 2003 (BBC Monitoring International Reports, December 16, 2003).
(10) See the statement by Putin cited in BBC Monitoring International Reports, November 7, 2003. Putin was especially concerned that Kyoto would interfere with Russia's energy supply.
(11) Illarionov, cited by Associated Press, November 30, 2003.
(12) Paul Webster, Last Chance for Kyoto, New Scientist, October 25, 2003. This source examines the issue of energy efficiency in depth.
(13) "RAO UES of Russia [the electricity monopoly], MDM Group, Gazprombank, RUSAL (Russian Aluminum), EvrazHolding and SIBUR intend to join the National Carbon Agreement, which is to set forth the rules of trading quotas for the discharge of greenhouse gases. As opposed to officials of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade, the businessmen are sure that quota sales are likely to become a mechanism of attracting funds for re-equipment of production capacities" (Agency WPS - What The Papers Say, August 29, 2003. Source: Vedomosti, August 27, 2003). See also RosBusinessConsulting Database, September 17, 2003.
(14) For example, in September 2003 a delegation from the European Parliament visiting Moscow warned that Russia might lose major investments by European firms if it did not ratify the protocol (Agence France Presse, September 18, 2003).
(15) ITAR-TASS, September 30, 2003


Russia, US Scientists to Cooperate in Arctic, Oceanic Studies
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 10, 2003 By Andrei Filatov

Russian and US scientists are to combine their efforts in the study of the Arctic and the World Ocean.

This is provided for by an agreement signed here between the Russian Academy of Sciences and the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The agreement also provides for the conduct of a joint expedition in the Chukchi and Bering seas.

The establishment of a world system for the observation of the Arctic climate, and projects to study the ecosystem and the environment in the area of the Arctic Ocean will be among other possible joint research programmes.


Frozen North Is under Threat. The Independent, December 11, 2003
By Steve Connor


It is one of mankind's final frontiers, a place of extreme cold and extraordinary beauty. But the North Pole's icecap is thawing fast. And many of us will live to see it disappear altogether

The frozen north is under threat. The land of ice and snow, of the Aurora borealis light shows and a jovial white-haired chap in a red outfit with white trim, is melting so fast that scientists predict a completely ice-free North Pole by the end of this century. That hasn't happened since the warm "interglacial' period before the last Ice Age - 30,000 years ago.

The dramatic change is already being felt by the region's dwindling population of 22,000 polar bears, whose springtime hunting grounds are literally melting away. They and the seals on which they feed can no longer rely on the vast frozen landscape that is crucial for their survival.

Then there are the indigenous Arctic peoples, loosely and incorrectly called Eskimo (the name means "raw-meat eater" and is considered pejorative by many native Inuit), whose way of life is also becoming untenable - groups such as the Saami, Aleut, Athabascan, Eyak and Metis, each with their own culture and traditions honed by generations of ancestors who learnt to exist in a climate so cold that it can instantly freeze human breath. Five years ago, the native people in Alaska began to voice their concerns about changes to their Arctic homeland. In a Greenpeace report called Answers from the Ice Edge, they gave worrying personal testimonies about the retreat of the sea ice. "For some odd reason the ugruks (bearded seals) that we hunt are further out there," said Gibson Moto, an Inupiat from the Alaskan village of Deering.

Benjamin Neakok, who lives in the northern Alaskan outpost of Point Lay, had his own concerns. "It makes it hard to hunt in fall time when the ice starts forming," he said. "It's kind of dangerous to be out. It's not really sturdy. And after it freezes there's always some open spots. Sometimes it doesn't freeze up until January."

These comments illustrate what the Arctic really is. The land of ice and snow is in fact a huge basin of floating sea-ice bordered by Greenland, Canada, Alaska, Siberia and Scandinavia. Sea ice exists all year round, but it thickens during the intensely cold Arctic winters, and melts away again during the long summer days of 24-hour sunlight.

But a warmer climate means that the summer melting period is getting longer - by about an extra five days every decade. As a result, the amount of sea ice left at the end of each summer has fallen significantly over the past 50 years. Using computer models, scientists at the Met Office predict the appearance of a totally ice-free North Pole by as soon as the summer of 2080, the fastest period of Arctic melting on record.

The polar bears and seals are not the only wildlife facing extinction. The Arctic is home to a unique range of marine animals, such as the narwhal with its long, unicorn-like tooth, the whiskered walrus and the white beluga whale. More than 150 species of fish are known to live in the Arctic Ocean, as do many rare birds such as auks and ivory gulls. Nobody can predict what an ice-free sea will do to them.

Signs that something was happening to the North Pole appeared in the late 1980s. The huge, nuclear-powered Russian ice-breaker, the Arctika, became the first surface ship to reach the geographic North Pole during a voyage in the summer of 1987. Now, it is common for tourists to sail to the North Pole through the thin summer ice.

Once, the Arctic was almost the sole preserve of the military. Its strategic position, straddling the top of the world between the two nuclear superpowers, meant that the region was a playground in which the cold warriors acted out their war games. The American nuclear-powered submarine USS Nautilus made the first under-ice journey to the North Pole in 1958. Russia, too, made secret forays, and Britain followed suit in 1971 with a voyage by HMS Dreadnought, the country's first nuclear-powered sub.

Unlike the old diesel-powered subs, which had to surface regularly to recharge their batteries, nuclear-powered vessels can stay underwater for much longer periods, making it possible to travel many thousands of miles beneath the thick sea ice. Occasionally, when the ice was thin enough, these submarines would surface, as Dreadnought did in 1971 near the geographic pole. Such stopovers boosted the morale of the crew, who could walk around or play football on top of the icecap.

The thickness of the polar ice was a critically important piece of information for the submarine captains. The Americans handed the task of calculating it to an "ice pilot", a naval officer with a knowledge of how to interpret the data from the submarine's upward-pointing sonar instruments. On British submarines, the task was carried out by a civilian scientist from the Scott Polar Research Institute in Cambridge. Peter Wadhams of the Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory in Oban, who is also professor of ocean physics at Cambridge University, has probably carried out more Arctic submarine trips than any civilian scientist.

Wadhams, who grew up near the docks in Tilbury, Essex, had always yearned to go to sea. After graduation, he signed up for a scientific expedition that took him around the entire coastline of North and South America - the first ever circumnavigation of the Americas. The subject of his doctorate was the Arctic sea ice, a relatively unknown subject in the 1970s. Thirty years ago, the talk was not of global warming, but global cooling. "There was a somewhat irrational fear that the world was heading for another Ice Age," Wadhams recalls. Another Ice Age is indeed on the cards, but probably not for another 10,000 years or so.

This concern meant that sea ice came into vogue in the late 1960s. Iceland had experienced three consecutive years of being ice-bound. It feared that its ports would become as paralysed in winter as those used by Russia's Northern Fleet, based in the high Arctic port of Murmansk. Such was the fear of a new Ice Age that Iceland held an international conference on sea ice in 1971 - the last year, as it turned out, that its ports were to freeze up.

Wadhams had chosen his specialism wisely. There was still much to learn about the nature of the Arctic's sea ice, the precise physics of its formation and the role it played in the wider climate of the region, and indeed the world. But what began to emerge from the submarine data was to overshadow other scientific findings. By the 1990s, it was apparent that the Arctic ice was getting thinner. Two teams of scientists had come to almost identical conclusions about the state of the polar icecap.

The Americans analysed data from submarine trips made between 1958-76 and 1993-1997, and found that the sea ice had thinned by 42 per cent. The British found a similar degree of thinning - 43 per cent - when they compared sonar data gathered in 1976 and 1996. The latest estimates suggest that the Arctic sea-ice has reduced from an average thickness of four metres to about 2.7 metres over the past 30 years. Satellite pictures of the surface area of the ice confirmed an overall shrinking of ice cover of about 4 per cent per decade.

What's most worrying about the data gathered over the past few decades is that the process appears to be entirely one-way. The Arctic is now warming up at a rate eight times faster than at any time over the past century, according to Mark Serreze, a satellite analyst at the University of Colorado. Summer this year was as bad as that of 2002, which itself set a record for high temperatures. Summers are not only longer; they are warmer, with temperatures rising by about 1.2C each decade. "In other words, we have not seen a recovery; what we are seeing reinforces that general trend," says Serreze.

What does all this mean for the North Pole, the indigenous people of the Arctic and its wildlife? Wadhams says there will be winners and losers. Among the benefits will be the opening of the northern sea route to all- year shipping, shortening the shipping distance between Japan and Europe by thousands of miles and providing a huge boost to the economy of Russia, which will control the sea lanes.

Another possible benefit is the melting of the ice in the Barents Sea, probably the coolest, purest and richest sea in the world. With little or no all-year ice cover, marine life will benefit from an increase in sunlight and phytoplankton, triggering the growth of even richer fishing grounds for cod and other commercial species.

But Wadhams points to a darker side. He says that about 7 per cent of the Earth's surface is covered by sea ice, much of it in the Arctic. Without sea ice, the planet would be a very different place. "The ice-covered seas represent the cold end of the enormous heat engine that enables the Earth to have temperatures suitable for human life over most of its surface," he explains.

The greatest fear is that the melting of the Arctic could disturb the ocean currents that flow like conveyor belts carrying heat from one part of the globe to another. For Britain, the most important current is the Gulf Stream, which brings heat from the Caribbean and ensures relatively mild winters. Without this, Britain would suffer the same bitterly cold winters as Newfoundland, which is at the same latitude but does not benefit from the Gulf Stream.

What worries scientists is that the engine driving the global conveyor belt might shut down. For instance, when sea ice forms it rejects salt, causing salinity in the surrounding water to rise. This cold, dense water sinks to the seabed, allowing warmer, less salty water to move in at the surface, driving the overall movement of the conveyor belt. If sea ice fails to form the process could end - and indeed it is already showing signs of slowing down.

Wadhams says he has recorded the disappearance of one important geographical feature that has played a critical role in this process. The Odden ice tongue was a huge spit of ice that formed off eastern Greenland each winter. The ice produced by the annual growth of the tongue was important to the ocean's circulation - yet it has disappeared. "There probably won't ever be a recovery of the Odden ice tongue in the Greenland Sea. It was last seen in 1997," Wadhams says.

So the Arctic has changed in a single generation, and will continue to change for the foreseeable future. One day this century the ice at the North Pole in summer will disappear entirely - and its disappearance could mark the beginning of a far more serious change for the rest of the world.


Moscow Hosts Russian-American Seminar on Oil Spill Prevention
RIA OREANDA, December 4, 2003

Moscow -- On December 4 within the framework of Russian-American energy cooperation two-day seminar on oil spill prevention and liquidation started at the RF Energy Ministry, - according to the ministry's press-service.

While opening the seminar, RF Deputy Energy Minister Oleg Gordeyev reminded its participants of the fact that in March 2003 the Russian and US Energy Ministers signed mutual declaration of intent. The declaration initiated the bilateral dialogue in the sphere of regulation and implementation of prevention and liquidation of the consequences of oil spills.

The participants of the seminar are: representatives of the RF Energy Ministry, Transportation Ministry, EMERCOM of Russia, Gosgortechnadzor (the Federal Mining and Industrial Inspectorate of Russia), Coastguard, Environment Protection Agency, the US Transportation department, as well as representatives of Norwegian Fisheries Ministry, and the large oil companies of the two countries, including ChevronTexaco, LUKOIL and TNK-BP.

The participants of the seminar are planning to discuss the issues of efficient program on preventing oil spills, pipeline and navigation standards, industrial security of manufacturing plants of oil and gas complex. The participants are also going to assess the risk of emergency oil spills, the prospective directions of technology development and facilities for the liquidation of emergencies, as well as other issues.


No Traces of Toxic Agents Found in White Sea
ITAR-TASS News Agency, December 2, 2003
By Vladimir Anufriyev

Arkhangelsk -- An expedition mounted by Russia's Ministry of Emergency Situations has not found any traces of toxic agents allegedly sunk in the White Sea, an official told Itar-Tass on Tuesday.

The expedition on the research vessel Professor Stockman probed the central part of the White Sea in August, where Soviet chemical weapons with expired shelf life were allegedly dumped after World War II, deputy head of the Ministry's Arkhangelsk region branch Elizaveta Tsyvareva.

Bottom sediment samples showed that the concentration of arsenic exceeded 10 to 30 times the maximum permissible level, which could be viewed as indication of the presence of poisonous substances.

But scientists came to the conclusion that it was a natural anomaly. All other chemical indicators of sea-water are within norm, Tsyvareva said.

The expedition also discovered "the presence of man-made objects" on the bottom of the White Sea which required study, but no special expeditions to this end are planned within the next few years, she said.


Russian Doubts over Kyoto Pact Cloud U.N. Conference on Climate Change
The Associated Press, November 30, 2003
By Frances D'Emilio

Indications that Russia will reject the Kyoto pact on greenhouse gas reduction has participants at a U.N. conference worried that the global treaty might never get off the ground.

When organizers, scientists and environmentalists began planning for the conference, which begins Monday and runs through Dec. 12 in Milan, many had hoped that Russia would have joined the protocol.

The treaty, negotiated in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, sets a target of cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 8 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

To date, 119 parties have signed on, but together they account for less than 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, the threshold needed for the treaty to go into force.

After President Bush rejected the treaty and its mandatory pollution reductions in 2001 as too harmful to the U.S. economy, Russia's support was needed to meet the 55-percent requirement.

But in October, Russian President Vladimir Putin predicted that the pact would fail to reverse climate change, "even with 100 percent compliance." His economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, contended the Kyoto Protocol would "doom Russia to poverty, weakness and backwardness."

Under the pact, if a country exceeds its emissions levels, it can be forced to cut back on industrial production.
Since the United States is the world's largest polluter, its refusal to join Kyoto is already "a big drag" on the battle to fight global warming, said Jonathan Pershing, a geologist heading the delegation of the World Resources Institute, a Washington environmental think tank.

A rejection by Russia will further present a dilemma to those countries which have embraced the treaty, participants said.
"There's a number of forks in the road," said Pershing. "Those countries who have said 'yes' go forward without a formal international treaty. But how do you do that?"

Pershing said back-room discussions at the conference will cover the possibilities, including one option that nations could sign a series of bilateral deals with other Kyoto members.Up for discussion in Milan are rules under which industrialized nations can earn credits toward satisfying their own emission-reducing requirements by helping developing nations, which aren't required under the protocol to reduce emissions.

Eligible projects range from making factories more energy efficient to helping promote forests, which absorb carbon dioxide, a chief greenhouse gas culprit.

"It doesn't matter where a carbon molecule comes from," in terms of overall greenhouse gas buildup, said Alden Meyer, a conference participant from the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists.

Meyer noted that the United States is a successful pioneer in what's known as emissions trading. Under a federal system, U.S. power companies can sell other companies credits they've earned for producing emissions linked to acid rain that are under capped levels.

The U.S. undersecretary for global affairs, Paula Dobriansky, who will attend the conference's final, high-level sessions, said the discussions will help illustrate "how promoting cleaner energy and energy technology is certainly in the interest of developing and developed countries alike."

The United Nations said the Milan conference will also evaluate efforts by governments to tackle the climate change challenge.
"That 2003 is on track to be one of the warmest years on record should be a warning that we must all take seriously," said Joke Waller-Hunter, executive secretary of the U.N. Climate Change Convention.

This spring, the European Union warned that 10 EU countries, including conference host Italy, are "way off track" for agreed targets on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

A rise in average temperatures has been blamed, at least in part, for melting glaciers and rising water levels, prompting fears that coming decades will witness floods, water shortages and hardships for animals.

Retired Vice Adm. Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., administrator of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said some questions about climate change are yet to be fully understood: the length of a carbon cycle, the way the molecule circulates around the planet and what humans contribute to global warming.

The United States aims to cut emissions by 18 percent over the next 10 years.

"The current administration has a policy to reduce greenhouse gas emission," said Lautenbacher. "Whether the world accepts that or not is another issue. We are not being irresponsible" by rejecting Kyoto, he contended.


Dam Condemns Aral Sea to Oblivion
Manchester Guardian Weekly, November 26, 2003
By Paul Brown

An 11km dam is being built across a small northern section of the shrunken Aral Sea in Central Asia, which is described as the world's worst environmental disaster.

The saline inland sea, divided between the former Soviet states of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, has been drying out for 25 years, since the USSR began a vast irrigation scheme drawing water from its two tributary rivers to grow cotton and rice in the desert.
Rescue schemes tried in the past decade have failed, and one of the two rivers has ceased to flow. In some places the depth of water has fallen from 54m to 28m, leaving the hulks of ships marooned in a desert wasteland.

Now Kazakhstan, which relied on the sea for fish, has decided to abandon most of the sea by building a dam to impound the waters of the second main river. It is part of a water battle with Uzbekistan, which itself stopped the flow into the south of the Aral from the Amu-Daria.

Tension between the two countries has been increased by a number of border incidents, and Uzbekistan has barred the whole of its part of the sea to visitors and aid agencies. The last outsider to visit the area said people who once worked as fishermen and farmers now survived only on food aid in a salt desert.

Cancer and liver and kidney failure are commonplace in adults and children. Protesters in Uzbekistan have been jailed.
Kazakhstan says its river, the SyrDaria, cannot by itself keep the whole sea alive. The water is in effect being wasted in the southern "dead zone".

It is spending $ 85m of its newly acquired oil wealth on reducing losses to the Syr-Daria from irrigation and winter flooding. And by building a dam across what is now a narrow neck of dry land it hopes to restore the fishery and reduce dust storms. The World Bank is helping to fund the dam.

Five countries -- Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan -- use the two rivers for irrigation. But the area irrigated was expanded from 6m hectares in the 1960s to 8m, and the sea began to shrink. It is reduced to three separate parts, and is still evaporating.

A British diplomat in Dushanbe, Tajikistan, said: "There is tension now over water; within 10 years if nothing changes there will be armed conflict."

Sirodjidin Aslow, chairman of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea, who has an office in Dushanbe, is trying to solve the problem.

"Soviet planning and the competition for water between these five states have turned the Aral Sea into trash," he said. "To restore the sea we need 1,000 cubic km of inflow a year, but we have barely one-tenth of that, and all that is from the north.
"The south gets only a trickle, if that. The shore line has receded on average by 250km . . . The level of salination has increased dramatically and the waters leave behind a salt paste containing pesticides and other minerals."

The northern part was in better condition because there was still some river inflow and three fish species survived, but the south was virtually dead. All five states contribute to the fund and have signed more than a dozen action plans.
Mr Aslow said: "We have a new 14-point action plan with a total of 58 projects that involve growing less thirsty crops, and we believe we can cut the water use by half with modern irrigation methods. We have to persuade the countries involved not to use the water saved for more irrigation."

An aid worker who was one of the last to visit the southern Aral region said: "The people are in a terrible state, drinking out of muddy ditches, which is all that remains of a once mighty river. We had a plan to relocate the people but Uzbekistan refused to agree and threw us out. No one has any idea what happened to the people we were trying to help."


[Back to the NEWS page]